Articulo de referencia

Haz de módulos

En matemáticas, un haz de O -módulos o simplemente un O -módulo sobre un espacio anillado ( X , O ) es un haz de grupos abelianos F tal que, para cualquier subconjunto abierto U...

En matemáticas, un haz de O -módulos o simplemente un O -módulo sobre un espacio anillado ( X , O ) es un haz de grupos abelianos F tal que, para cualquier subconjunto abierto U de X , F ( U ) es un O ( U )-módulo y los mapas de restricción F ( U )  F ( V ) son compatibles con los mapas de restricción O ( U ) → O ( V ): la restricción de fs es la restricción de f por la restricción de s para cualquier f en O ( U ) y s en F ( U ).   

El caso estándar es cuando X es un esquema y O su haz de estructura. Si O es el haz constanteZ_{\displaystyle {\underline {\mathbf {Z} }}}, entonces un haz de O -módulos es lo mismo que un haz de grupos abelianos (es decir, un haz abeliano ).

Si X es el espectro primo de un anillo R , entonces cualquier R -módulo define un O X -módulo (llamado haz asociado ) de forma natural. De manera similar, si R es un anillo graduado y X es el Proj de R , entonces cualquier módulo graduado define un O X -módulo de forma natural. Los O -módulos que surgen de esta manera son ejemplos de haces cuasi-coherentes , y de hecho, en esquemas afines o proyectivos, todos los haces cuasi-coherentes se obtienen de esta forma.

Los haces de módulos sobre un espacio anillado forman una categoría abeliana . [ 1 ] Además, esta categoría tiene suficientes inyectivos , [ 2 ] y, en consecuencia, se puede definir y se define la cohomología de haces.Hi(incógnita,){\displaystyle \operatorname {H} ^{i}(X,-)}como el i -ésimo functor derivado derecho del functor de sección globalΓ(incógnita,){\displaystyle \Gamma (X,-)}. [ 3 ]

Ejemplos

  • Dado un espacio anillado ( X , O ), si F es un O -submódulo de O , entonces se le llama haz de ideales o haz de ideales de O , ya que para cada subconjunto abierto U de X , F ( U ) es un ideal del anillo O ( U ).
  • Sea X una variedad lisa de dimensión n . Entonces el haz tangente de X es el dual del haz cotangente.Ωincógnita{\displaystyle \Omega _{X}}y el haz canónicoωincógnita{\displaystyle \omega _{X}}es la n -ésima potencia exterior ( determinante ) deΩincógnita{\displaystyle \Omega _{X}}.
  • Un haz de álgebras es un haz de módulos que también es un haz de anillos.

Operaciones

Sea ( X , O ) un espacio anillado. Si F y G son O -módulos, entonces su producto tensorial, denotado por

FOGRAMO{\displaystyle F\otimes _{O}G}oFGRAMO{\displaystyle F\otimes G},

es el módulo O que es el haz asociado al prehazUF(U)O(U)GRAMO(U).{\displaystyle U\mapsto F(U)\otimes _{O(U)}G(U).}(Para ver que la cesación no se puede evitar, calcule las secciones globales deO(1)O(1)=O{\displaystyle O(1)\otimes O(-1)=O}donde O (1) es el haz retorcido de Serre en un espacio proyectivo.)

De manera similar, si F y G son O -módulos, entonces

HometroO(F,GRAMO){\displaystyle {\mathcal {H}}om_{O}(F,G)}

denota el O -módulo que es el hazUInicioO|U(F|U,GRAMO|U){\displaystyle U\mapsto \operatorname {Hom} _{O|_{U}}(F|_{U},G|_{U})}. [ 4 ] En particular, el módulo O

HometroO(F,O){\displaystyle {\mathcal {H}}om_{O}(F,O)}

se denomina módulo dual de F y se denota porFˇ{\displaystyle {\check {F}}}. Nota: para cualesquiera O -módulos E , F , existe un homomorfismo canónico

miˇFHometroO(mi,F){\displaystyle {\check {E}}\otimes F\to {\mathcal {H}}om_{O}(E,F)},

which is an isomorphism if E is a locally free sheaf of finite rank. In particular, if L is locally free of rank one (such L is called an invertible sheaf or a line bundle),[5] then this reads:

LˇLO,{\displaystyle {\check {L}}\otimes L\simeq O,}

implying the isomorphism classes of invertible sheaves form a group. This group is called the Picard group of X and is canonically identified with the first cohomology group H1(X,O){\displaystyle \operatorname {H} ^{1}(X,{\mathcal {O}}^{*})} (by the standard argument with Čech cohomology).

If E is a locally free sheaf of finite rank, then there is an O-linear map EˇEEndO(E)O{\displaystyle {\check {E}}\otimes E\simeq \operatorname {End} _{O}(E)\to O} given by the pairing; it is called the trace map of E.

For any O-module F, the tensor algebra, exterior algebra and symmetric algebra of F are defined in the same way. For example, the k-th exterior power

kF{\displaystyle \bigwedge ^{k}F}

is the sheaf associated to the presheaf UO(U)kF(U){\textstyle U\mapsto \bigwedge _{O(U)}^{k}F(U)}. If F is locally free of rank n, then nF{\textstyle \bigwedge ^{n}F} is called the determinant line bundle (though technically invertible sheaf) of F, denoted by det(F). There is a natural perfect pairing:

rFnrFdet(F).{\displaystyle \bigwedge ^{r}F\otimes \bigwedge ^{n-r}F\to \det(F).}

Let f: (X, O) →(X', O') be a morphism of ringed spaces. If F is an O-module, then the direct image sheaffF{\displaystyle f_{*}F} is an O'-module through the natural map O'f*O (such a natural map is part of the data of a morphism of ringed spaces.)

If G is an O'-module, then the module inverse image fG{\displaystyle f^{*}G} of G is the O-module given as the tensor product of modules:

f1Gf1OO{\displaystyle f^{-1}G\otimes _{f^{-1}O'}O}

where f1G{\displaystyle f^{-1}G} is the inverse image sheaf of G and f1OO{\displaystyle f^{-1}O'\to O} is obtained from OfO{\displaystyle O'\to f_{*}O} by adjuction.

There is an adjoint relation between f{\displaystyle f_{*}} and f{\displaystyle f^{*}}: for any O-module F and O'-module G,

HomO(fG,F)HomO(G,fF){\displaystyle \operatorname {Hom} _{O}(f^{*}G,F)\simeq \operatorname {Hom} _{O'}(G,f_{*}F)}

as abelian group. There is also the projection formula: for an O-module F and a locally free O'-module E of finite rank,

f(FfE)fFE.{\displaystyle f_{*}(F\otimes f^{*}E)\simeq f_{*}F\otimes E.}

Properties

Let (X, O) be a ringed space. An O-module F is said to be generated by global sections if there is a surjection of O-modules:

iIOF0.{\displaystyle \bigoplus _{i\in I}O\to F\to 0.}

Explicitly, this means that there are global sections si of F such that the images of si in each stalk Fx generates Fx as Ox-module.

An example of such a sheaf is that associated in algebraic geometry to an R-module M, R being any commutative ring, on the spectrum of a ringSpec(R). Another example: according to Cartan's theorem A, any coherent sheaf on a Stein manifold is spanned by global sections. (cf. Serre's theorem A below.) In the theory of schemes, a related notion is ample line bundle. (For example, if L is an ample line bundle, some power of it is generated by global sections.)

An injective O-module is flasque (i.e., all restrictions maps F(U) → F(V) are surjective).[6] Since a flasque sheaf is acyclic in the category of abelian sheaves, this implies that the i-th right derived functor of the global section functor Γ(X,){\displaystyle \Gamma (X,-)} in the category of O-modules coincides with the usual i-th sheaf cohomology in the category of abelian sheaves.[7]

Sheaf associated to a module

Let M{\displaystyle M} be a module over a ring A{\displaystyle A}. Put X=Spec(A){\displaystyle X=\operatorname {Spec} (A)} and write D(f)={f0}=Spec(A[f1]){\displaystyle D(f)=\{f\neq 0\}=\operatorname {Spec} (A[f^{-1}])}. For each pair D(f)D(g){\displaystyle D(f)\subseteq D(g)}, by the universal property of localization, there is a natural map

ρg,f:M[g1]M[f1]{\displaystyle \rho _{g,f}:M[g^{-1}]\to M[f^{-1}]}

having the property that ρg,f=ρg,hρh,f{\displaystyle \rho _{g,f}=\rho _{g,h}\circ \rho _{h,f}}. Then

D(f)M[f1]{\displaystyle D(f)\mapsto M[f^{-1}]}

is a contravariant functor from the category whose objects are the sets D(f) and morphisms the inclusions of sets to the category of abelian groups. One can show[8] it is in fact a B-sheaf (i.e., it satisfies the gluing axiom) and thus defines the sheaf M~{\displaystyle {\widetilde {M}}} on X called the sheaf associated to M.

The most basic example is the structure sheaf on X; i.e., OX=A~{\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{X}={\widetilde {A}}}. Moreover, M~{\displaystyle {\widetilde {M}}} has the structure of OX=A~{\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{X}={\widetilde {A}}}-module and thus one gets the exact functorMM~{\displaystyle M\mapsto {\widetilde {M}}} from ModA, the category of modules over A to the category of modules over OX{\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{X}}. It defines an equivalence from ModA to the category of quasi-coherent sheaves on X, with the inverse Γ(X,){\displaystyle \Gamma (X,-)}, the global section functor. When X is Noetherian, the functor is an equivalence from the category of finitely generated A-modules to the category of coherent sheaves on X.

The construction has the following properties: for any A-modules M, N, and any morphism φ:MN{\displaystyle \varphi :M\to N},

  • M[f1]=M~|D(f){\displaystyle M[f^{-1}]^{\sim }={\widetilde {M}}|_{D(f)}}.[9]
  • For any prime ideal p of A, M~pMp{\displaystyle {\widetilde {M}}_{p}\simeq M_{p}} as Op = Ap-module.
  • (MAN)M~A~N~{\displaystyle (M\otimes _{A}N)^{\sim }\simeq {\widetilde {M}}\otimes _{\widetilde {A}}{\widetilde {N}}}.[10]
  • If M is finitely presented, HomA(M,N)HomA~(M~,N~){\displaystyle \operatorname {Hom} _{A}(M,N)^{\sim }\simeq {\mathcal {H}}om_{\widetilde {A}}({\widetilde {M}},{\widetilde {N}})}.[10]
  • HomA(M,N)Γ(X,HomA~(M~,N~)){\displaystyle \operatorname {Hom} _{A}(M,N)\simeq \Gamma (X,{\mathcal {H}}om_{\widetilde {A}}({\widetilde {M}},{\widetilde {N}}))}, since the equivalence between ModA and the category of quasi-coherent sheaves on X.
  • (limMi)limMi~{\displaystyle (\varinjlim M_{i})^{\sim }\simeq \varinjlim {\widetilde {M_{i}}}};[11] in particular, taking a direct sum and ~ commute.
  • A sequence of A-modules is exact if and only if the induced sequence by {\displaystyle \sim } is exact. In particular, (ker(φ))=ker(φ~),(coker(φ))=coker(φ~),(im(φ))=im(φ~){\displaystyle (\ker(\varphi ))^{\sim }=\ker({\widetilde {\varphi }}),(\operatorname {coker} (\varphi ))^{\sim }=\operatorname {coker} ({\widetilde {\varphi }}),(\operatorname {im} (\varphi ))^{\sim }=\operatorname {im} ({\widetilde {\varphi }})}.

Sheaf associated to a graded module

There is a graded analog of the construction and equivalence in the preceding section. Let R be a graded ring generated by degree-one elements as R0-algebra (R0 means the degree-zero piece) and M a graded R-module. Let X be the Proj of R (so X is a projective scheme if R is Noetherian). Then there is an O-module M~{\displaystyle {\widetilde {M}}} such that for any homogeneous element f of positive degree of R, there is a natural isomorphism

M~|{f0}(M[f1]0){\displaystyle {\widetilde {M}}|_{\{f\neq 0\}}\simeq (M[f^{-1}]_{0})^{\sim }}

as sheaves of modules on the affine scheme {f0}=Spec(R[f1]0){\displaystyle \{f\neq 0\}=\operatorname {Spec} (R[f^{-1}]_{0})};[12] in fact, this defines M~{\displaystyle {\widetilde {M}}} by gluing.

Example: Let R(1) be the graded R-module given by R(1)n = Rn+1. Then O(1)=R(1)~{\displaystyle O(1)={\widetilde {R(1)}}} is called Serre's twisting sheaf, which is the dual of the tautological line bundle if R is finitely generated in degree-one.

If F is an O-module on X, then, writing F(n)=FO(n){\displaystyle F(n)=F\otimes O(n)}, there is a canonical homomorphism:

(n0Γ(X,F(n)))F,{\displaystyle \left(\bigoplus _{n\geq 0}\Gamma (X,F(n))\right)^{\sim }\to F,}

which is an isomorphism if and only if F is quasi-coherent.

Computing sheaf cohomology

Sheaf cohomology has a reputation for being difficult to calculate. Because of this, the next general fact is fundamental for any practical computation:

TheoremLet X be a topological space, F an abelian sheaf on it and U{\displaystyle {\mathfrak {U}}} an open cover of X such that Hi(Ui0Uip,F)=0{\displaystyle \operatorname {H} ^{i}(U_{i_{0}}\cap \cdots \cap U_{i_{p}},F)=0} for any i, p and Uij{\displaystyle U_{i_{j}}}'s in U{\displaystyle {\mathfrak {U}}}. Then for any i,

Hi(X,F)=Hi(C(U,F)){\displaystyle \operatorname {H} ^{i}(X,F)=\operatorname {H} ^{i}(C^{\bullet }({\mathfrak {U}},F))}

where the right-hand side is the i-th Čech cohomology.

Serre's vanishing theorem[13] states that if X is a projective variety and F a coherent sheaf on it, then, for sufficiently large n, the Serre twistF(n) is generated by finitely many global sections. Moreover,

  1. For each i, Hi(X, F) is finitely generated over R0, and
  2. There is an integer n0, depending on F, such that Hi(X,F(n))=0,i1,nn0.{\displaystyle \operatorname {H} ^{i}(X,F(n))=0,\,i\geq 1,n\geq n_{0}.}

[14][15][16]

Sheaf extension

Let (X, O) be a ringed space, and let F, H be sheaves of O-modules on X. An extension of H by F is a short exact sequence of O-modules

0FGH0.{\displaystyle 0\rightarrow F\rightarrow G\rightarrow H\rightarrow 0.}

As with group extensions, if we fix F and H, then all equivalence classes of extensions of H by F form an abelian group (cf. Baer sum), which is isomorphic to the Ext groupExtO1(H,F){\displaystyle \operatorname {Ext} _{O}^{1}(H,F)}, where the identity element in ExtO1(H,F){\displaystyle \operatorname {Ext} _{O}^{1}(H,F)} corresponds to the trivial extension.

In the case where H is O, we have: for any i ≥ 0,

Hi(X,F)=ExtOi(O,F),{\displaystyle \operatorname {H} ^{i}(X,F)=\operatorname {Ext} _{O}^{i}(O,F),}

since both the sides are the right derived functors of the same functor Γ(X,)=HomO(O,).{\displaystyle \Gamma (X,-)=\operatorname {Hom} _{O}(O,-).}

Note: Some authors, notably Hartshorne, drop the subscript O.

Assume X is a projective scheme over a Noetherian ring. Let F, G be coherent sheaves on X and i an integer. Then there exists n0 such that

ExtOi(F,G(n))=Γ(X,ExtOi(F,G(n))),nn0{\displaystyle \operatorname {Ext} _{O}^{i}(F,G(n))=\Gamma (X,{\mathcal {Ext}}_{O}^{i}(F,G(n))),\,n\geq n_{0}},

where ExtO{\displaystyle {\mathcal {Ext}}_{O}} denotes the derived functors of HomO{\displaystyle {\mathcal {Hom}}_{O}}.[17]

Locally free resolutions

Ext(F,G){\displaystyle {\mathcal {Ext}}({\mathcal {F}},{\mathcal {G}})} can be readily computed for any coherent sheaf F{\displaystyle {\mathcal {F}}} using a locally free resolution:[18] given a complex

L2L1L0F0{\displaystyle \cdots \to {\mathcal {L}}_{2}\to {\mathcal {L}}_{1}\to {\mathcal {L}}_{0}\to {\mathcal {F}}\to 0}

then

RHom(F,G)=Hom(L,G){\displaystyle {\mathcal {RHom}}({\mathcal {F}},{\mathcal {G}})={\mathcal {Hom}}({\mathcal {L}}_{\bullet },{\mathcal {G}})}

hence

Extk(F,G)=hk(Hom(L,G)){\displaystyle {\mathcal {Ext}}^{k}({\mathcal {F}},{\mathcal {G}})=h^{k}({\mathcal {Hom}}({\mathcal {L}}_{\bullet },{\mathcal {G}}))}

Examples

Hypersurface

Consider a smooth hypersurfaceX{\displaystyle X} of degree d{\displaystyle d}. Then, we can compute a resolution

O(d)O{\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}(-d)\to {\mathcal {O}}}

and find that

Exti(OX,F)=hi(Hom(O(d)O,F)){\displaystyle {\mathcal {Ext}}^{i}({\mathcal {O}}_{X},{\mathcal {F}})=h^{i}({\mathcal {Hom}}({\mathcal {O}}(-d)\to {\mathcal {O}},{\mathcal {F}}))}

Union of smooth complete intersections

Consider the scheme

X=Proj(C[x0,,xn](f)(g1,g2,g3))Pn{\displaystyle X={\text{Proj}}\left({\frac {\mathbb {C} [x_{0},\ldots ,x_{n}]}{(f)(g_{1},g_{2},g_{3})}}\right)\subseteq \mathbb {P} ^{n}}

where (f,g1,g2,g3){\displaystyle (f,g_{1},g_{2},g_{3})} is a smooth complete intersection and deg(f)=d{\displaystyle \deg(f)=d}, deg(gi)=ei{\displaystyle \deg(g_{i})=e_{i}}. We have a complex

O(de1e2e3)[g3g2g1]O(de1e2)O(de1e3)O(de2e3)[g2g30g10g30g1g2]O(de1)O(de2)O(de3)[fg1fg2fg3]O{\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}(-d-e_{1}-e_{2}-e_{3}){\xrightarrow {\begin{bmatrix}g_{3}\\-g_{2}\\-g_{1}\end{bmatrix}}}{\begin{matrix}{\mathcal {O}}(-d-e_{1}-e_{2})\\\oplus \\{\mathcal {O}}(-d-e_{1}-e_{3})\\\oplus \\{\mathcal {O}}(-d-e_{2}-e_{3})\end{matrix}}{\xrightarrow {\begin{bmatrix}g_{2}&g_{3}&0\\-g_{1}&0&-g_{3}\\0&-g_{1}&g_{2}\end{bmatrix}}}{\begin{matrix}{\mathcal {O}}(-d-e_{1})\\\oplus \\{\mathcal {O}}(-d-e_{2})\\\oplus \\{\mathcal {O}}(-d-e_{3})\end{matrix}}{\xrightarrow {\begin{bmatrix}fg_{1}&fg_{2}&fg_{3}\end{bmatrix}}}{\mathcal {O}}}

resolving OX,{\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{X},} which we can use to compute Exti(OX,F){\displaystyle {\mathcal {Ext}}^{i}({\mathcal {O}}_{X},{\mathcal {F}})}.

See also

Notes

  1. Vakil, Math 216: Foundations of algebraic geometry, 2.5.
  2. Hartshorne, Ch. III, Proposition 2.2.
  3. This cohomology functor coincides with the right derived functor of the global section functor in the category of abelian sheaves; cf. Hartshorne, Ch. III, Proposition 2.6.
  4. There is a canonical homomorphism:
    HomO(F,O)xHomOx(Fx,Ox),{\displaystyle {\mathcal {H}}om_{O}(F,O)_{x}\to \operatorname {Hom} _{O_{x}}(F_{x},O_{x}),}
    which is an isomorphism if F is of finite presentation (EGA, Ch. 0, 5.2.6.)
  5. For coherent sheaves, having a tensor inverse is the same as being locally free of rank one; in fact, there is the following fact: if FGO{\displaystyle F\otimes G\simeq O} and if F is coherent, then F, G are locally free of rank one. (cf. EGA, Ch 0, 5.4.3.)
  6. Hartshorne, Ch III, Lemma 2.4.
  7. see also: https://math.stackexchange.com/q/447234
  8. Hartshorne, Ch. II, Proposition 5.1.
  9. EGA I 1971, Ch. I, Proposition 1.3.6.
  10. 12EGA I 1971, Ch. I, Corollaire 1.3.12.
  11. EGA I 1971, Ch. I, Corollaire 1.3.9.
  12. Hartshorne, Ch. II, Proposition 5.11.
  13. "Section 30.2 (01X8): Čech cohomology of quasi-coherent sheaves—The Stacks project". stacks.math.columbia.edu. Retrieved 2023-12-07.
  14. Costa, Miró-Roig & Pons-Llopis 2021, Theorem 1.3.1
  15. "Links with sheaf cohomology". Local Cohomology. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press. 2012. pp. 438–479. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139044059.023. ISBN 9780521513630.
  16. Serre 1955, §.66 Faisceaux algébriques cohérents sur les variétés projectives.
  17. Hartshorne, Ch. III, Proposition 6.9.
  18. Hartshorne, Robin. Algebraic Geometry. pp. 233–235.

References

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sheaf_of_modules&oldid=1359994808"