Articulo de referencia

Decimal

Place value of number in decimal system A decimal system (also called base-ten , denary or decenary ) is a numeral system that uses ten as its radix (base). Decimal systems are ...

Place value of number in decimal system

A decimal system (also called base-ten, denary or decenary) is a numeral system that uses ten as its radix (base). Decimal systems are the global standard for denoting integer and non-integer numbers. The way of denoting numbers in a decimal system is often referred to as decimal notation.[1] Presently, the most common decimal system is the Hindu–Arabic numeral system, which is a positional numeral system. However, there are also non-positional base-ten systems, such as Roman or Chinese numerals.

A decimal numeral (also often just decimal or, less correctly, decimal number), generally refers to the notation of a number in a decimal numeral system. Non-integral decimals may be identified by a decimal separator (usually "." or "," as in 25.9703 or 3.1415).[2] In English, the word decimal often refers to the digits after the decimal separator, for example, that "3.14 is the approximation of π to two decimals" or "two decimal places."

The numbers that may be represented exactly by a decimal of finite length are the decimal fractions. That is, fractions of the form a/10n, where a is an integer, and n is a non-negative integer. Decimal fractions also result from the addition of an integer and a fractional part; the resulting sum sometimes is called a fractional number.

Decimals are commonly used to approximate real numbers. By increasing the number of digits after the decimal separator, one can make the approximation errors as small as one wants, when one has a method for computing the new digits. In the sciences, the number of decimal places given generally gives an indication of the precision to which a quantity is known; for example, if a mass is given as 1.32 milligrams, it usually means there is reasonable confidence that the true mass is somewhere between 1.315 milligrams and 1.325 milligrams, whereas if it is given as 1.320 milligrams, then it is likely between 1.3195 and 1.3205 milligrams. The same holds in pure mathematics; for example, if one computes the square root of 22 to two digits past the decimal point, the answer is 4.69, whereas computing it to three digits, the answer is 4.690. The extra 0 at the end is meaningful, in spite of the fact that 4.69 and 4.690 are the same real number.

In principle, the decimal expansion of any real number can be carried out as far as desired past the decimal point. If the expansion reaches a point where all remaining digits are zero, then the remainder can be omitted, and such an expansion is called a terminating decimal. A repeating decimal is an infinite decimal that, after some place, repeats indefinitely the same sequence of digits (e.g., 5.123144144144144... = 5.123144).[3] An infinite decimal represents a rational number, the quotient of two integers, if and only if it is a repeating decimal or has a finite number of non-zero digits.

Origin

Ten digits on two hands, the possible origin of decimal counting

Many numeral systems of ancient civilizations use ten and its powers for representing numbers, possibly because there are ten fingers on two hands and people started counting by using their fingers. Examples are firstly the Egyptian numerals, then the Brahmi numerals, Greek numerals, Hebrew numerals, Roman numerals, and Chinese numerals.[4] Very large numbers were difficult to represent in these old numeral systems, and only the best mathematicians were able to multiply or divide large numbers. These difficulties were completely solved with the introduction of the Hindu–Arabic numeral system for representing integers. This system has been extended to represent some non-integer numbers, called decimal fractions or decimal numbers, for forming the decimal numeral system.[4]

Decimal notation

For writing numbers, a decimal system typically uses ten decimal digits, a decimal mark, and, for negative numbers, a minus sign "−". The decimal digits in Arabic numerals are 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9;[5] the decimal separator is the dot "." in many countries (mostly English-speaking),[6] and a comma "," in other countries.[2]

For representing a non-negative number, a decimal numeral consists of

  • either a (finite) sequence of digits (such as "2017"), where the entire sequence represents an integer:
    amam1a0{\displaystyle a_{m}a_{m-1}\ldots a_{0}}
  • or a decimal mark separating two sequences of digits (such as "20.70828")
amam1a0.b1b2bn{\displaystyle a_{m}a_{m-1}\ldots a_{0}.b_{1}b_{2}\ldots b_{n}}.

If m > 0, that is, if the first sequence contains at least two digits, it is generally assumed that the first digit am is not zero. In some circumstances it may be useful to have one or more 0's on the left; this does not change the value represented by the decimal: for example, 3.14 = 03.14 = 003.14. Similarly, if the final digit on the right of the decimal mark is zero—that is, if bn = 0—it may be removed; conversely, trailing zeros may be added after the decimal mark without changing the represented number; [note 1] for example, 15 = 15.0 = 15.00 and 5.2 = 5.20 = 5.200.

For representing a negative number, a minus sign is placed before am.

The numeral amam1a0.b1b2bn{\displaystyle a_{m}a_{m-1}\ldots a_{0}.b_{1}b_{2}\ldots b_{n}} represents the number

am10m+am110m1++a0100+b1101+b2102++bn10n{\displaystyle a_{m}10^{m}+a_{m-1}10^{m-1}+\cdots +a_{0}10^{0}+{\frac {b_{1}}{10^{1}}}+{\frac {b_{2}}{10^{2}}}+\cdots +{\frac {b_{n}}{10^{n}}}}.

The integer part or integral part of a decimal numeral is the integer written to the left of the decimal separator (see also truncation). For a non-negative decimal numeral, it is the largest integer that is not greater than the decimal. The part from the decimal separator to the right is the fractional part, which equals the difference between the numeral and its integer part.

When the integral part of a numeral is zero, it may occur, typically in computing, that the integer part is not written (for example, .1234, instead of 0.1234). In normal writing, this is generally avoided, because of the risk of confusion between the decimal mark and other punctuation.

In brief, the contribution of each digit to the value of a number depends on its position in the numeral.

Decimal fractions

Decimal fractions (sometimes called decimal numbers, especially in contexts involving explicit fractions) are the rational numbers that may be expressed as a fraction whose denominator is a power of ten.[7] For example, the decimal expressions 0.8,14.89,0.00079,1.618,3.14159{\displaystyle 0.8,14.89,0.00079,1.618,3.14159}representan las fracciones 8 / 10 , 1489 / 100 , 79 / 100000 , + 1618 / 1000 y + 314159 / 100000 , y por lo tanto denotan fracciones decimales. Un ejemplo de una fracción que no puede representarse mediante una expresión decimal (con un número finito de dígitos) es 1 / 3 , ya que 3 no es una potencia de 10.

En términos más generales, un decimal con n dígitos después del separador (un punto o una coma) representa la fracción con denominador 10 n , cuyo numerador es el entero obtenido al eliminar el separador.

De ello se deduce que un número es una fracción decimal si y solo si tiene una representación decimal finita.

Expresados ​​como fracciones totalmente simplificadas , los números decimales son aquellos cuyo denominador es producto de una potencia de 2 y una potencia de 5. Por lo tanto, los denominadores más pequeños de los números decimales son:

1=2050,2=2150,4=2250,5=2051,8=2350,10=2151,16=2450,20=2251,25=2052,{\displaystyle 1=2^{0}\cdot 5^{0},2=2^{1}\cdot 5^{0},4=2^{2}\cdot 5^{0},5=2^{0}\cdot 5^{1},8=2^{3}\cdot 5^{0},10=2^{1}\cdot 5^{1},16=2^{4}\cdot 5^{0},20=2^{2}\cdot 5^{1},25=2^{0}\cdot 5^{2},\ldots }

Aproximación mediante números decimales

Los números decimales no permiten una representación exacta de todos los números reales . Sin embargo, permiten aproximar cualquier número real con la precisión deseada; por ejemplo, el decimal 3,14159 se aproxima a π con una diferencia menor a 10⁻⁵ . Por ello, los decimales se utilizan ampliamente en la ciencia , la ingeniería y la vida cotidiana.

Más precisamente, para cada número real x y cada entero positivo n , existen dos decimales L y u con como máximo n dígitos después de la marca decimal tales que Lxu y ( uL ) = 10 n .

Numbers are very often obtained as the result of measurement. As measurements are subject to measurement uncertainty with a known upper bound, the result of a measurement is well-represented by a decimal with n digits after the decimal mark, as soon as the absolute measurement error is bounded from above by 10n. In practice, measurement results are often given with a certain number of digits after the decimal point, which indicate the error bounds. For example, although 0.080 and 0.08 denote the same number, the decimal numeral 0.080 suggests a measurement with an error less than 0.001, while the numeral 0.08 indicates an absolute error bounded by 0.01. In both cases, the true value of the measured quantity could be, for example, 0.0803 or 0.0796 (see also significant figures).

Infinite decimal expansion

For a real numberx and an integer n ≥ 0, let [x]n denote the (finite) decimal expansion of the greatest number that is not greater than x that has exactly n digits after the decimal mark. Let di denote the last digit of [x]i. It is straightforward to see that [x]n may be obtained by appending dn to the right of [x]n−1. This way one has

[x]n = [x]0.d1d2...dn−1dn,

and the difference of [x]n−1 and [x]n amounts to

|[x]n[x]n1|=dn10n<10n+1{\displaystyle \left\vert \left[x\right]_{n}-\left[x\right]_{n-1}\right\vert =d_{n}\cdot 10^{-n}<10^{-n+1}},

which is either 0, if dn = 0, or gets arbitrarily small as n tends to infinity. According to the definition of a limit, x is the limit of [x]n when n tends to infinity. This is written asx=limn[x]n{\textstyle \;x=\lim _{n\rightarrow \infty }[x]_{n}\;}or

x = [x]0.d1d2...dn...,

which is called an infinite decimal expansion of x.

Por el contrario, para cualquier entero [ x ] 0 y cualquier secuencia de dígitos(dnorte)norte=1{\textstyle \;(d_{n})_{n=1}^{\infty }}La expresión (infinita) [ x ] 0 . d 1 d 2 ... d n ... es una expansión decimal infinita de un número real x . Esta expansión es única si ni todos los d n son iguales a 9 ni todos los d n son iguales a 0 para n suficientemente grande (para todo n mayor que algún número natural N ).

Si todos los d n para n > N son iguales a 9 y [ x ] n = [ x ] 0 . d 1 d 2 ... d n , el límite de la secuencia([incógnita]norte)norte=1{\textstyle \;([x]_{n})_{n=1}^{\infty }}es la fracción decimal que se obtiene al reemplazar el último dígito que no es un 9, es decir: d N , por d N + 1 , y reemplazar todos los 9 subsiguientes por 0 (ver 0,999... ).

Cualquier fracción decimal de este tipo, es decir: d n = 0 para n > N , puede convertirse a su expansión decimal infinita equivalente reemplazando d N por d N − 1 y reemplazando todos los 0 subsiguientes por 9 (ver 0,999... ).

En resumen, cada número real que no es una fracción decimal tiene una única expansión decimal infinita. Cada fracción decimal tiene exactamente dos expansiones decimales infinitas: una que contiene solo ceros después de alguna posición, que se obtiene mediante la definición anterior de [ x ] n , y otra que contiene solo nueves después de alguna posición, que se obtiene definiendo [ x ] n como el mayor número menor que x , que tiene exactamente n dígitos después de la coma decimal.

Números racionales

Long division allows computing the infinite decimal expansion of a rational number. If the rational number is a decimal fraction, the division stops eventually, producing a decimal numeral, which may be prolongated into an infinite expansion by adding infinitely many zeros. If the rational number is not a decimal fraction, the division may continue indefinitely. However, as all successive remainders are less than the divisor, there are only a finite number of possible remainders, and after some place, the same sequence of digits must be repeated indefinitely in the quotient. That is, one has a repeating decimal. For example,

1/81 = 0.012345679012... (with the group 012345679 indefinitely repeating).

The converse is also true: if, at some point in the decimal representation of a number, the same string of digits starts repeating indefinitely, the number is rational.

or, dividing both numerator and denominator by 6, 692/1665.

Decimal computation

Diagram of the world's earliest known multiplication table (c.305 BCE) from the Warring States period

Most modern computer hardware and software systems commonly use a binary representation internally (although many early computers, such as the ENIAC or the IBM 650, used decimal representation internally).[8] For external use by computer specialists, this binary representation is sometimes presented in the related octal or hexadecimal systems.

For most purposes, however, binary values are converted to or from the equivalent decimal values for presentation to or input from humans; computer programs express literals in decimal by default. (123.1, for example, is written as such in a computer program, even though many computer languages are unable to encode that number precisely.)

Tanto el hardware como el software informático utilizan representaciones internas que son efectivamente decimales para almacenar valores decimales y realizar operaciones aritméticas. A menudo, estas operaciones se realizan sobre datos codificados mediante alguna variante del sistema decimal codificado en binario (BCD ) , [ 9 ] [ 10 ] especialmente en implementaciones de bases de datos, pero existen otras representaciones decimales en uso (incluida la coma flotante decimal, como en las revisiones más recientes del estándar IEEE 754 para aritmética de coma flotante ). [ 11 ]

La aritmética decimal se utiliza en las computadoras para que los resultados fraccionarios decimales de la suma (o resta) de valores con una longitud fija de su parte fraccionaria siempre se calculen con esa misma longitud de precisión. Esto es especialmente importante para los cálculos financieros, por ejemplo, que requieren en sus resultados múltiplos enteros de la unidad monetaria más pequeña para fines contables. Esto no es posible en binario, porque las potencias negativas de10{\displaystyle 10}no tienen representación fraccionaria binaria finita; y generalmente es imposible multiplicarlas (o dividirlas). [ 12 ] [ 13 ] Véase Aritmética de precisión arbitraria para cálculos exactos.

Historia

La tabla de multiplicar decimal más antigua del mundo se elaboró ​​con tablillas de bambú y data del año 305 a. C., durante el período de los Reinos Combatientes en China.

Many ancient cultures calculated with numerals based on ten, perhaps because two human hands have ten fingers.[14] Standardized weights used in the Indus Valley Civilisation (c.3300–1300 BCE) were based on the ratios: 1/20, 1/10, 1/5, 1/2, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, and 500, while their standardized ruler – the Mohenjo-daro ruler – was divided into ten equal parts.[15][16][17]Egyptian hieroglyphs, in evidence since around 3000 BCE, used a purely decimal system,[18] as did the Linear A script (c.1800–1450 BCE) of the Minoans[19][20] and the Linear B script (c. 1400–1200 BCE) of the Mycenaeans. The Únětice culture in central Europe (2300-1600 BC) used standardised weights and a decimal system in trade.[21] The number system of classical Greece also used powers of ten, including an intermediate base of 5, as did Roman numerals.[22] Notably, the polymath Archimedes (c. 287–212 BCE) invented a decimal positional system in his Sand Reckoner which was based on 108.[22][23]Hittite hieroglyphs (since 15th century BCE) were also strictly decimal.[24]

The Egyptian hieratic numerals, the Greek alphabet numerals, the Hebrew alphabet numerals, the Roman numerals, the Chinese numerals and early Indian Brahmi numerals are all non-positional decimal systems, and required large numbers of symbols. For instance, Egyptian numerals used different symbols for 10, 20 to 90, 100, 200 to 900, 1,000, 2,000, 3,000, 4,000, to 10,000.[25] The world's earliest positional decimal system was the Chinese rod calculus.[26]

The world's earliest positional decimal system Upper row vertical form Lower row horizontal form

History of decimal fractions

counting rod decimal fraction 1/7

Starting from the 2nd century BCE, some Chinese units for length were based on divisions into ten; by the 3rd century CE these metrological units were used to express decimal fractions of lengths, non-positionally.[27] Calculations with decimal fractions of lengths were performed using positional counting rods, as described in the 3rd–5th century CE Sunzi Suanjing. The 5th century CE mathematician Zu Chongzhi calculated a 7-digit approximation of π. Qin Jiushao's book Mathematical Treatise in Nine Sections (1247) explicitly writes a decimal fraction representing a number rather than a measurement, using counting rods.[28] The number 0.96644 is denoted

.

Historians of Chinese science have speculated that the idea of decimal fractions may have been transmitted from China to the Middle East.[26]

Al-Khwarizmi introduced fractions to Islamic countries in the early 9th century CE, written with a numerator above and denominator below, without a horizontal bar. This form of fraction remained in use for centuries.[26][29]

Positional decimal fractions appear for the first time in a book by the Arab mathematician Abu'l-Hasan al-Uqlidisi written in the 10th century.[30] The Jewish mathematician Immanuel Bonfils used decimal fractions around 1350 but did not develop any notation to represent them.[31] The Persian mathematician Jamshid al-Kashi significantly advanced the theory in the 15th century. In his work, The Key to Arithmetic (Miftah al-Hisab), al-Kashi provided the first systematic and comprehensive treatment of decimal fractions as a complete system, predating similar European developments by nearly 175 years.[32]

A forerunner of modern European decimal notation was introduced by Simon Stevin in the 16th century. Stevin's influential booklet De Thiende ("the art of tenths") was first published in Dutch in 1585 and translated into French as La Disme.[33]

John Napier introduced using the period (.) to separate the integer part of a decimal number from the fractional part in his book on constructing tables of logarithms, published posthumously in 1620.[34]:p. 8,archive p. 32

Natural languages

A method of expressing every possible natural number using a set of ten symbols emerged in India.[35] Several Indian languages show a straightforward decimal system. Dravidian languages have numbers between 10 and 20 expressed in a regular pattern of addition to 10.[36]

The Hungarian language also uses a straightforward decimal system. All numbers between 10 and 20 are formed regularly (e.g. 11 is expressed as "tizenegy" literally "one on ten"), as with those between 20 and 100 (23 as "huszonhárom" = "three on twenty").

A straightforward decimal rank system with a word for each order (10 , 100 , 1000 , 10,000 ), and in which 11 is expressed as ten-one and 23 as two-ten-three, and 89,345 is expressed as 8 (ten thousands) 9 (thousand) 3 (hundred) 4 (tens) 5 is found in Chinese, and in Vietnamese with a few irregularities. Japanese, Korean, and Thai have imported the Chinese decimal system. Many other languages with a decimal system have special words for the numbers between 10 and 20, and decades. For example, in English 11 is "eleven" not "ten-one" or "one-teen".

Incan languages such as Quechua and Aymara have an almost straightforward decimal system, in which 11 is expressed as ten with one and 23 as two-ten with three.

Some psychologists suggest irregularities of the English names of numerals may hinder children's counting ability.[37]

Other bases

Some cultures do, or did, use other bases of numbers.

  • Pre-ColumbianMesoamerican cultures such as the Maya used a base-20 system (perhaps based on using all twenty fingers and toes).
  • The Yuki language in California and the Oto-Pamean languages[38] in Mexico have octal (base-8) systems because the speakers count using the spaces between their fingers rather than the fingers themselves.[39]
  • La existencia de una base no decimal en los primeros vestigios de las lenguas germánicas está atestiguada por la presencia de palabras y glosas que significan que el conteo está en decimal (cognados de "conteo de diez" o "por diez"); esto sería de esperar si el conteo normal no fuera decimal, y sería inusual si lo fuera. [ 40 ] [ 41 ] Donde se conoce este sistema de conteo, se basa en el " centena largo " = 120, y un "mil largo" de 1200. Las descripciones como "largo" solo aparecen después de que el "centena pequeño" de 100 apareciera con los cristianos. La Introducción al nórdico antiguo de EV Gordon [ 42 ] da nombres de números que pertenecen a este sistema. Una expresión cognada de «ciento ochenta» se traduce como 200, y la cognada de «doscientos» se traduce como 240. Goodare [ 43 ] detalla el uso del centenar largo en Escocia durante la Edad Media, dando ejemplos como cálculos donde el acarreo implica i C (es decir, cien) como 120, etc. Que la población general no se alarmara al encontrar tales números sugiere un uso bastante común. También es posible evitar números similares a los centenares utilizando unidades intermedias, como piedras y libras, en lugar de un conteo largo de libras. Goodare da ejemplos de números como vii score, donde se evita el centenar utilizando puntuaciones extendidas. También hay un artículo de WH Stevenson sobre «El centenar largo y sus usos en Inglaterra». [ 44 ] [ 45 ]
  • Muchas o todas las lenguas chumashan utilizaban originalmente un sistema de numeración de base 4 , en el que los nombres de los números estaban estructurados según múltiplos de 4 y 16. [ 46 ]
  • Muchos idiomas [ 47 ] utilizan sistemas numéricos quinarios (de base 5) , incluidos Gumatj , Nunggubuyu , [ 48 ] Kuurn Kopan Noot [ 49 ] y Saraveca . De estos, Gumatj es el único idioma verdadero de 5 a 25 conocido, en el que 25 es el grupo superior de 5.
  • Algunos nigerianos utilizan sistemas duodecimales . [ 50 ] También lo hacían algunas pequeñas comunidades en India y Nepal, como lo indican sus idiomas. [ 51 ]
  • The Huli language of Papua New Guinea is reported to have base-15 numbers.[52]Ngui means 15, ngui ki means 15 × 2 = 30, and ngui ngui means 15 × 15 = 225.
  • Umbu-Ungu, also known as Kakoli, is reported to have base-24 numbers.[53]Tokapu means 24, tokapu talu means 24 × 2 = 48, and tokapu tokapu means 24 × 24 = 576.
  • Ngiti is reported to have a base-32 number system with base-4 cycles.[47]
  • The Ndom language of Papua New Guinea is reported to have base-6 numerals.[54]Mer means 6, mer an thef means 6 × 2 = 12, nif means 36, and nif thef means 36×2 = 72.

See also

Notes

  1. Sometimes, the extra zeros are used for indicating the accuracy of a measurement. For example, "15.00 m" may indicate that the measurement error is less than one centimetre (0.01 m), while "15 m" may mean that the length is roughly fifteen metres and that the error may exceed 10 centimetres.

References

  1. Yong, Lam Lay; Se, Ang Tian (April 2004). Fleeting Footsteps. World Scientific. 268. doi:10.1142/5425. ISBN 978-981-238-696-0. Archived from the original on April 1, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2022.
  2. 12Weisstein, Eric W. (March 10, 2022). "Decimal Point". Wolfram MathWorld. Archived from the original on March 21, 2022. Retrieved March 17, 2022.
  3. The vinculum (overline) in 5.123144 indicates that the '144' sequence repeats indefinitely, i.e. 5.123144144144144....
  4. 1 2 Lockhart, Paul (2017). Aritmética . Cambridge, Massachusetts Londres, Inglaterra: The Belknap Press de Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-97223-0.
  5. En algunos países, como los de habla árabe , se utilizanotros glifos para los dígitos.
  6. Weisstein, Eric W. "Decimal" . mathworld.wolfram.com . Archivado del original el 18 de marzo de 2020. Consultado el 22 de agosto de 2020 .
  7. "Fracción decimal" . Enciclopedia de Matemáticas . Archivado del original el 11 de diciembre de 2013. Consultado el 18 de junio de 2013 .
  8. "¿Dedos o puños? (La elección de la representación decimal o binaria)", Werner Buchholz , Communications of the ACM , vol. 2, n.º 12, págs. 3-11, ACM Press, diciembre de 1959.
  9. Schmid, Hermann (1983) [1974]. Cálculo decimal (1.ª ed. (reimpresión) ). Malabar, Florida: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company. ISBN  0-89874-318-4.
  10. Schmid, Hermann (1974). Cálculo decimal (1.ª ed.). Binghamton, Nueva York: John Wiley & Sons . ISBN  0-471-76180-X.
  11. Punto flotante decimal: Algoritmos para computadoras , Cowlishaw, Mike F. , Actas del 16.º Simposio IEEE sobre aritmética computacional , ISBN 0-7695-1894-X, págs. 104–11, IEEE Comp. Soc., 2003
  12. "Aritmética decimal - Preguntas frecuentes" . Archivado del original el 29 de abril de 2009. Consultado el 15 de agosto de 2008 .
  13. Punto flotante decimal: Algoritmos para computadoras Archivado el 16/11/2003 en Wayback Machine , Cowlishaw , MF, Actas del 16.º Simposio IEEE sobre aritmética computacional ( ARITH  16 Archivado el 19/08/2010 en Wayback Machine ), ISBN 0-7695-1894-X, págs.  104–11, IEEE Comp. Soc., junio de 2003
  14. Dantzig, Tobias (1954), Number / The Language of Science (4.ª ed.), The Free Press (Macmillan Publishing Co.), p. 12, ISBN   0-02-906990-4{{citation}}: Incompatibilidad de ISBN/Fecha ( ayuda )
  15. ^ Sergent, Bernard (1997), Genèse de l'Inde (en francés), París: Payot, p. 113, ISBN 2-228-89116-9
  16. Coppa, A.; et al. (2006). "Early Neolithic tradition of dentistry: Flint tips were surprisingly effective for drilling tooth enamel in a prehistoric population". Nature. 440 (7085): 755–56. Bibcode:2006Natur.440..755C. doi:10.1038/440755a. PMID 16598247. S2CID 6787162.
  17. Bisht, R. S. (1982), "Excavations at Banawali: 1974–77", in Possehl, Gregory L. (ed.), Harappan Civilisation: A Contemporary Perspective, New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., pp. 113–24
  18. Georges Ifrah: From One to Zero. A Universal History of Numbers, Penguin Books, 1988, ISBN 0-14-009919-0, pp. 200–13 (Egyptian Numerals)
  19. Graham Flegg: Numbers: their history and meaning, Courier Dover Publications, 2002, ISBN 978-0-486-42165-0, p. 50
  20. Georges Ifrah: From One to Zero. A Universal History of Numbers, Penguin Books, 1988, ISBN 0-14-009919-0, pp. 213–18 (Cretan numerals)
  21. Krause, Harald; Kutscher, Sabrina (2017). "Spangenbarrenhort Oberding: Zusammenfassung und Ausblick". Spangenbarrenhort Oberding. Museum Erding. pp. 238–243. ISBN 978-3-9817606-5-1.
  22. 12"Greek numbers". Archived from the original on July 21, 2019. Retrieved July 21, 2019.
  23. Menninger, Karl: Zahlwort und Ziffer. Eine Kulturgeschichte der Zahl, Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 3rd. ed., 1979, ISBN 3-525-40725-4, pp. 150–53
  24. Georges Ifrah: From One to Zero. A Universal History of Numbers, Penguin Books, 1988, ISBN 0-14-009919-0, pp. 218f. (The Hittite hieroglyphic system)
  25. Lam Lay Yong et al. The Fleeting Footsteps pp. 137–39
  26. 123Lam Lay Yong, "The Development of Hindu–Arabic and Traditional Chinese Arithmetic", Chinese Science, 1996 p. 38, Kurt Vogel notation
  27. Joseph Needham (1959). "19.2 Decimals, Metrology, and the Handling of Large Numbers". Science and Civilisation in China. Vol. III, "Mathematics and the Sciences of the Heavens and the Earth". Cambridge University Press. pp. 82–90.
  28. Jean-Claude Martzloff, A History of Chinese Mathematics, Springer 1997 ISBN 3-540-33782-2
  29. Lay Yong, Lam. "A Chinese Genesis, Rewriting the history of our numeral system". Archive for History of Exact Sciences. 38: 101–08.
  30. Berggren, J. Lennart (2007). «Las matemáticas en el Islam medieval». En Katz, Victor J. (ed.). Las matemáticas de Egipto, Mesopotamia, China, India e Islam: Un compendio . Princeton University Press. pág. 530. ISBN  978-0-691-11485-9.
  31. Gandz, S. : La invención de las fracciones decimales y la aplicación del cálculo exponencial por Immanuel Bonfils de Tarascon (c. 1350), Isis 25 (1936), 16–45.
  32. Rashed, Roshdi (1994). El desarrollo de las matemáticas árabes: entre la aritmética y el álgebra . Kluwer Academic Publishers. pág. 149. 
  33. BL van der Waerden (1985). Una historia del álgebra. "De Khwarizmi a Emmy Noether" . Berlín: Springer-Verlag.
  34. Napier, John (1889) [1620]. La construcción del maravilloso canon de los logaritmos . Traducido por Macdonald, William Rae. Edimburgo: Blackwood & Sons vía Internet Archive. En los números distinguidos así por un punto en medio, todo lo que se escribe después del punto es una fracción cuyo denominador es la unidad con tantas cifras después como cifras haya después del punto.
  35. "Números indios" . Matemáticas de la antigua India .
  36. "Apéndice: Conjuntos de cognados para lenguas dravídicas" , Wikcionario, el diccionario libre , 25 de septiembre de 2024 , consultado el 9 de noviembre de 2024
  37. Azar, Beth (1999). "Las palabras en inglés pueden obstaculizar el desarrollo de las habilidades matemáticas" . APA Monitor . 30 (4). Archivado del original el 21 de octubre de 2007.
  38. Avelino, Heriberto (2006). "La tipología de los sistemas numéricos pame y los límites de Mesoamérica como área lingüística" (PDF) . Linguistic Typology . 10 (1): 41– 60. doi : 10.1515/LINGTY.2006.002 . S2CID 20412558. Archivado (PDF) del original el 12 de julio de 2006. 
  39. Marcia Ascher . "Etnomatemáticas: una visión multicultural de las ideas matemáticas". The College Mathematics Journal. JSTOR 2686959 . 
  40. McClean, R. J. (July 1958), "Observations on the Germanic numerals", German Life and Letters, 11 (4): 293–99, doi:10.1111/j.1468-0483.1958.tb00018.x, Some of the Germanic languages appear to show traces of an ancient blending of the decimal with the vigesimal system.
  41. Voyles, Joseph (October 1987), "The cardinal numerals in pre-and proto-Germanic", The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 86 (4): 487–95, JSTOR 27709904.
  42. Gordon's Introduction to Old NorseArchived 2016-04-15 at the Wayback Machine p. 293
  43. Goodare, Julian (November 1994). "The long hundred in medieval and early modern Scotland". Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland. 123: 395–418. doi:10.9750/psas.123.395.418.
  44. Stevenson, W.H. (1890). "The Long Hundred and its uses in England". Archaeological Review. December 1889: 313–22.
  45. Poole, Reginald Lane (2006). The Exchequer in the twelfth century : the Ford lectures delivered in the University of Oxford in Michaelmas term, 1911. Clark, NJ: Lawbook Exchange. ISBN 1-58477-658-7. OCLC 76960942.
  46. There is a surviving list of Ventureño language number words up to 32 written down by a Spanish priest ca. 1819. "Chumashan Numerals" by Madison S. Beeler, in Native American Mathematics, edited by Michael P. Closs (1986), ISBN 0-292-75531-7.
  47. 12Hammarström, Harald (May 17, 2007). "Rarities in Numeral Systems". In Wohlgemuth, Jan; Cysouw, Michael (eds.). Rethinking Universals: How rarities affect linguistic theory(PDF). Empirical Approaches to Language Typology. Vol. 45. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter (published 2010). Archived from the original(PDF) on August 19, 2007.
  48. Harris, John (1982). Hargrave, Susanne (ed.). "Facts and fallacies of aboriginal number systems"(PDF). Work Papers of SIL-AAB Series B. 8: 153–81. Archived from the original(PDF) on August 31, 2007.
  49. Dawson, J. "Australian Aborigines: The Languages and Customs of Several Tribes of Aborigines in the Western District of Victoria (1881), p. xcviii.
  50. Matsushita, Shuji (1998). Decimal vs. Duodecimal: An interaction between two systems of numeration. 2nd Meeting of the AFLANG, October 1998, Tokyo. Archived from the original on October 5, 2008. Retrieved May 29, 2011.
  51. Mazaudon, Martine (2002). "Les principes de construction du nombre dans les langues tibéto-birmanes". In François, Jacques (ed.). La Pluralité(PDF). Leuven: Peeters. pp. 91–119. ISBN 90-429-1295-2. Archived from the original(PDF) on March 28, 2016. Retrieved September 12, 2014.
  52. Cheetham, Brian (1978). "Counting and Number in Huli". Papua New Guinea Journal of Education. 14: 16–35. Archived from the original on September 28, 2007.
  53. Bowers, Nancy; Lepi, Pundia (1975). "Kaugel Valley systems of reckoning"(PDF). Journal of the Polynesian Society. 84 (3): 309–24. Archived from the original(PDF) on June 4, 2011.
  54. Owens, Kay (2001), "The Work of Glendon Lean on the Counting Systems of Papua New Guinea and Oceania", Mathematics Education Research Journal, 13 (1): 47–71, Bibcode:2001MEdRJ..13...47O, doi:10.1007/BF03217098, S2CID 161535519, archived from the original on September 26, 2015