Hispanopedia Wiki
Articulo de referencia

Breeder reactor

The Beloyarsk Nuclear Power Station , site of the BN-600 and BN-800 , the only two commercially operational breeder reactors as of 2026 A breeder reactor is a nuclear reactor th...

Hispanopedia WikiContenido en espanolLectura gratuita

The Beloyarsk Nuclear Power Station, site of the BN-600 and BN-800, the only two commercially operational breeder reactors as of 2026

A breeder reactor is a nuclear reactor that generates more fissile material than it consumes.[1] These reactors can be fueled with more-commonly available isotopes of uranium and thorium, such as uranium-238 and thorium-232, as opposed to the rare uranium-235 which is used in conventional reactors. These materials are called fertile materials since they can be bred into fuel by these breeder reactors.

Breeder reactors achieve this because their neutron economy is high enough to create more fissile fuel than they use. These extra neutrons are absorbed by the fertile material that is loaded into the reactor along with fissile fuel. This irradiated fertile material in turn transmutes into fissile material which can undergo fission reactions.

Breeders were at first found attractive because they made more complete use of uranium fuel than light-water reactors, but interest declined after the 1960s as more uranium reserves were found[2] and new methods of uranium enrichment reduced fuel costs.

Breeder reactors have been developed and operated in Russia, India, Japan, the United States, France, and China, but only Russia is currently operating a commercial fast breeder reactor as of April 2026.

Types

Production of heavy transuranic actinides in current thermal-neutron fission reactors through neutron capture and decays. Starting at uranium-238, isotopes of plutonium, americium, and curium are all produced. In a fast neutron-breeder reactor, all these isotopes may be burned as fuel.

Many types of breeder reactor are possible:

A "breeder" is simply a nuclear reactor designed for very high neutron economy with an associated conversion rate higher than 1.0. In principle, almost any reactor design could be tweaked to become a breeder. For example, the light-water reactor, a heavily moderated thermal design, evolved into the RMWR concept, using light water in a low-density supercritical form to increase the neutron economy enough to allow breeding.

Además de los reactores refrigerados por agua, existen muchos otros tipos de reactores reproductores que se contemplan actualmente como posibles. Entre ellos se incluyen diseños refrigerados por sales fundidas , por gas y por metal líquido , en diversas variantes. Casi cualquiera de estos diseños básicos puede alimentarse con uranio , plutonio , muchos actínidos menores o torio , y pueden diseñarse para diversos fines, como la producción de combustible fisionable, el funcionamiento estable a largo plazo o la quema activa de residuos nucleares .

Los diseños de reactores existentes a veces se dividen en dos grandes categorías según su espectro de neutrones, que generalmente separa aquellos diseñados para usar principalmente uranio y transuránicos de aquellos diseñados para usar torio y evitar los transuránicos. Estos diseños son:

  • Los reactores reproductores rápidos (FBR, por sus siglas en inglés) utilizan neutrones rápidos (es decir, no moderados) para producir plutonio fisionable (y posiblemente transuránicos superiores) a partir de uranio-238 fértil . El espectro de neutrones rápidos es lo suficientemente flexible como para que también pueda producir uranio-233 fisionable a partir de torio, si se desea.
  • Los reactores reproductores térmicos utilizan neutrones de espectro térmico o lentos (es decir, moderados ) para producir uranio-233 fisionable a partir de torio . Debido al comportamiento de los distintos combustibles nucleares, se considera que un reactor reproductor térmico solo es comercialmente viable con combustible de torio, lo que evita la acumulación de los elementos transuránicos más pesados.

reactor reproductor rápido

Diagrama esquemático que muestra la diferencia entre los tipos de LMFBR de bucle y de piscina.
El reactor reproductor experimental II , que sirvió como prototipo para el reactor rápido integral.

A partir de 2026, todas las centrales eléctricas FBR a gran escala son reactores reproductores rápidos de metal líquido refrigerados por sodio (LMFBR) de uno de los dos diseños siguientes: [ 1 ] : 43

  • Tipo de circuito cerrado , en el que el refrigerante primario circula a través de intercambiadores de calor primarios fuera del tanque del reactor (pero dentro del blindaje biológico debido al 24Na radiactivo presente en el refrigerante primario).
  • Tipo piscina , en el que los intercambiadores de calor primarios y las bombas están sumergidos en el tanque del reactor.

A fecha de 2017, solo existen dos reactores reproductores en funcionamiento comercial.: the BN-600 reactor, at 560 MWe, and the BN-800 reactor, at 880 MWe. Both are Russian sodium-cooled reactors. The designs use liquid metal as the primary coolant, to transfer heat from the core to steam used to power the electricity generating turbines. FBRs cooled by liquid metals other than sodium have been built, some early FBRs such as Clementine used mercury, Lead-cooled fast reactor have also been constructed, as well as other experimental reactors using Lead-bismuth eutectic, molten tin, or NaK, a sodium-potassium alloy. Mercury and NaK have the advantage that they are liquids at room temperature, which is convenient for experimental rigs but less important for pilot or full-scale power stations, where their chemical toxicity and cost respectively leave them as less attractive options. Lead-cooled fast reactor as well as those utilizing Lead-bismuth eutectic saw extensive use in the Soviet Union, with liquid Lead seeing use in the BREST (reactor) and Lead-bismuth eutectic having a troubled career as a coolant in Alfa-class submarine'sOK-550 and BM-40A reactors[3] as well as the SVBR-100 reactor.[4]

Three of the proposed generation IV reactor types are FBRs:[5]

FBRs usually use a mixed oxide fuel core of up to 20% plutonium dioxide (PuO2) and at least 80% uranium dioxide (UO2). Another fuel option is metal alloys, typically a blend of uranium, plutonium, and zirconium (used because it is "transparent" to neutrons). Enriched uranium can be used on its own.

Many designs surround the reactor core in a blanket of tubes that contain non-fissile uranium-238, which, by capturing fast neutrons from the reaction in the core, converts to fissile plutonium-239 (as is some of the uranium in the core), which is then reprocessed and used as nuclear fuel. Other FBR designs rely on the geometry of the fuel (which also contains uranium-238), arranged to attain sufficient fast neutron capture. The plutonium-239 (or the fissile uranium-235) fissile cross-section is much smaller in a fast spectrum than in a thermal spectrum, as is the ratio between the 239Pu/235U fission cross-section and the 238U absorption cross-section. This increases the concentration of 239Pu/235U needed to sustain a chain reaction, as well as the ratio of breeding to fission.[6] On the other hand, a fast reactor needs no moderator to slow down the neutrons at all, taking advantage of the fast neutrons producing a greater number of neutrons per fission than slow neutrons. For this reason ordinary liquid water, being a moderator and neutron absorber, is an undesirable primary coolant for fast reactors. Because large amounts of water in the core are required to cool the reactor, the yield of neutrons and therefore breeding of 239Pu are strongly affected. Theoretical work has been done on reduced moderation water reactors, which may have a sufficiently fast spectrum to provide a breeding ratio slightly over 1. This would likely result in an unacceptable power derating and high costs in a liquid-water-cooled reactor, but the supercritical water coolant of the supercritical water reactor (SCWR) has sufficient heat capacity to allow adequate cooling with less water, making a fast-spectrum water-cooled reactor a practical possibility.[7]

The type of coolants, temperatures, and fast neutron spectrum puts the fuel cladding material (normally austenitic stainless or ferritic-martensitic steels) under extreme conditions. The understanding of the radiation damage, coolant interactions, stresses, and temperatures are necessary for the safe operation of any reactor core. All materials used to date in sodium-cooled fast reactors have known limits.[8]Oxide dispersion-strengthened alloy steel is viewed as the long-term radiation resistant fuel-cladding material that can overcome the shortcomings of today's material choices.

Integral fast reactor

One design of fast neutron reactor, specifically conceived to address the waste disposal and plutonium issues, was the integral fast reactor (IFR, also known as an integral fast breeder reactor, although the original reactor was designed to not breed a net surplus of fissile material).[9][10]

To solve the waste disposal problem, the IFR had an on-site electrowinning fuel-reprocessing unit that recycled the uranium and all the transuranics (not just plutonium) via electroplating, leaving just short-half-lifefission products in the waste. Some of these fission products could later be separated for industrial or medical uses and the rest sent to a waste repository. The IFR pyroprocessing system uses molten cadmium cathodes and electrorefiners to reprocess metallic fuel directly on-site at the reactor.[11] Such systems co-mingle all the minor actinides with both uranium and plutonium. The systems are compact and self-contained, so that no plutonium-containing material needs to be transported away from the site of the breeder reactor. Breeder reactors incorporating such technology would most likely be designed with breeding ratios very close to 1.00, so that after an initial loading of enriched uranium and/or plutonium fuel, the reactor would then be refueled only with small deliveries of natural uranium. A quantity of natural uranium equivalent to a block about the size of a milk crate delivered once per month would be all the fuel such a 1 gigawatt reactor would need.[12] Such self-contained breeders are currently envisioned as the final self-contained and self-supporting ultimate goal of nuclear reactor designers.[13][6] The project was canceled in 1994 by United States Secretary of EnergyHazel O'Leary.[14][15]

Other fast reactors

The graphite core of the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment

The first fast reactor built and operated was the Los Alamos Plutonium Fast Reactor ("Clementine") in Los Alamos, NM.[16] Clementine was fueled by Ga-stabilized delta-phase Pu and cooled with mercury. It contained a 'window' of Th-232 in anticipation of breeding experiments, but no reports were made available regarding this feature.

Another proposed fast reactor is a fast molten salt reactor, in which the molten salt's moderating properties are insignificant. This is typically achieved by replacing the light metal fluorides (e.g. LiF, BeF2) in the salt carrier with heavier metal chlorides (e.g., KCl, RbCl, ZrCl4).

Several prototype FBRs have been built, ranging in electrical output from a few light bulbs' equivalent (EBR-I, 1951) to over 1,000 MWe. As of 2006, the technology is not economically competitive to thermal reactor technology, but India, Japan, China, South Korea, and Russia are all committing substantial research funds to further development of fast breeder reactors, anticipating that rising uranium prices will change this in the long term. Germany, in contrast, abandoned the technology due to safety concerns. The SNR-300 fast breeder reactor was finished after 19 years despite cost overruns summing up to a total of €3.6 billion, only to then be abandoned.[17]

Thermal breeder reactor

The Shippingport Reactor, used as a prototype light water breeder for five years beginning in August 1977

The advanced heavy-water reactor is one of the few proposed large-scale uses of thorium.[18] India is developing this technology, motivated by substantial thorium reserves; almost a third of the world's thorium reserves are in India, which lacks significant uranium reserves.

The third and final core of the Shippingport Atomic Power Station 60 MWe reactor was a light water thorium breeder, which began operating in 1977.[19] It used pellets made of thorium dioxide and uranium-233 oxide; initially, the U-233 content of the pellets was 5–6% in the seed region, 1.5–3% in the blanket region, and none in the reflector region. It operated at 236 MWt, generating 60 MWe, and ultimately produced over 2.1 billion kilowatt hours of electricity. After five years, the core was removed and found to contain nearly 1.4% more fissile material than when it was installed, demonstrating that breeding from thorium had occurred.[20][21]

A liquid fluoride thorium reactor is also planned as a thorium thermal breeder. Liquid-fluoride reactors may have attractive features, such as inherent safety, no need to manufacture fuel rods, and possibly simpler reprocessing of the liquid fuel. This concept was first investigated at the Oak Ridge National LaboratoryMolten-Salt Reactor Experiment in the 1960s. From 2012 it became the subject of renewed interest worldwide.[22]

Fuel resources

Breeder reactors could, in principle, extract almost all of the energy contained in uranium or thorium, decreasing fuel requirements by a factor of 100 compared to widely used once-through light water reactors, which extract less than 1% of the energy in the actinide metal (uranium or thorium) mined from the earth.[13] The high fuel-efficiency of breeder reactors could greatly reduce concerns about fuel supply, energy used in mining, and storage of radioactive waste. With seawater uranium extraction (currently too expensive to be economical), there is enough fuel for breeder reactors to satisfy the world's energy needs for 5 billion years at 1983's total energy consumption rate, thus making nuclear energy effectively a renewable energy.[23][24] In addition to seawater, the average crustal granite rocks contain significant quantities of uranium and thorium that with breeder reactors can supply abundant energy for the remaining lifespan of the sun on the main sequence of stellar evolution.[25]

Nuclear waste

In broad terms, spent nuclear fuel has three main components. The first consists of fission products, the leftover fragments of fuel atoms after they have been split to release energy. Fission products come in dozens of elements and hundreds of isotopes, all of them lighter than uranium. The second main component of spent fuel is transuranics (atoms heavier than uranium), which are generated from uranium or heavier atoms in the fuel when they absorb neutrons but do not undergo fission. All transuranic isotopes fall within the actinide series on the periodic table, and so they are frequently referred to as the actinides. The largest component is the remaining uranium which is around 98.25% uranium-238, 1.1% uranium-235, and 0.65% uranium-236. The U-236 comes from the non-fission capture reaction where U-235 absorbs a neutron but releases only a high energy gamma ray instead of undergoing fission.

The physical behavior of the fission products is markedly different from that of the actinides. In particular, fission products do not undergo fission and therefore cannot be used as nuclear fuel. Indeed, because fission products are often neutron poisons (absorbing neutrons that could be used to sustain a chain reaction), fission products are viewed as nuclear 'ashes' left over from consuming fissile materials. Furthermore, only seven long-lived fission product isotopes have half-lives longer than a hundred years, which makes their geological storage or disposal less problematic than for transuranic materials.[31]

With increased concerns about nuclear waste, breeding fuel cycles came under renewed interest as they can reduce actinide wastes, particularly plutonium and minor actinides.[32] Breeder reactors are designed to fission the actinide wastes as fuel and thus convert them to more fission products. After spent nuclear fuel is removed from a light water reactor, it undergoes a complex decay profile as each nuclide decays at a different rate. There is a large gap in the decay half-lives of fission products compared to transuranic isotopes. If the transuranics are left in the spent fuel, after 1,000 to 100,000 years the slow decay of these transuranics would generate most of the radioactivity in that spent fuel. Thus, removing the transuranics from the waste eliminates much of the long-term radioactivity of spent nuclear fuel.[33]

Today's commercial light-water reactors do breed some new fissile material, mostly in the form of plutonium. Because commercial reactors were never designed as breeders, they do not convert enough uranium-238 into plutonium to replace the uranium-235 consumed. Nonetheless, at least one-third of the power produced by commercial nuclear reactors comes from fission of plutonium generated within the fuel.[34] Even with this level of plutonium consumption, light water reactors consume only part of the plutonium and minor actinides they produce, and nonfissile isotopes of plutonium build up, along with significant quantities of other minor actinides.[35]

Breeding fuel cycles attracted renewed interest because of their potential to reduce actinide wastes, particularly various isotopes of plutonium and the minor actinides (neptunium, americium, curium, etc.).[32] Since breeder reactors on a closed fuel cycle would use nearly all of the isotopes of these actinides fed into them as fuel, their fuel requirements would be reduced by a factor of about 100. The volume of waste they generate would be reduced by a factor of about 100 as well. While there is a huge reduction in the volume of waste from a breeder reactor, the activity of the waste is about the same as that produced by a light-water reactor.[36]

Waste from a breeder reactor has a different decay behavior because it is made up of different materials. Breeder reactor waste is mostly fission products, while light-water reactor waste is mostly unused uranium isotopes and a large quantity of transuranics. After spent nuclear fuel has been removed from a light-water reactor for longer than 100,000 years, the transuranics would be the main source of radioactivity. Eliminating them would eliminate much of the long-term radioactivity from the spent fuel.[33]

In principle, breeder fuel cycles can recycle and consume all actinides,[23] leaving only fission products. As the graphic in this section indicates, fission products have a peculiar "gap" in their aggregate half-lives, such that no fission products have a half-life between 91 and 200,000 years. As a result of this physical oddity, after several hundred years in storage, the activity of the radioactive waste from an FBR would quickly drop to the low level of the long-lived fission products. However, to obtain this benefit requires the highly efficient separation of transuranics from spent fuel. If the fuel reprocessing methods used leave a large fraction of the transuranics in the final waste stream, this advantage would be greatly reduced.[13]

The FBR's fast neutrons can fission actinide nuclei with even numbers of both protons and neutrons. Such nuclei usually lack the low-speed "thermal neutron" resonances of fissile fuels used in LWRs.[37] The thorium fuel cycle inherently produces lower levels of heavy actinides. The fertile material in the thorium fuel cycle has an atomic weight of 232, while the fertile material in the uranium fuel cycle has an atomic weight of 238. That mass difference means that thorium-232 requires six more neutron capture events per nucleus before the transuranic elements can be produced. In addition to this simple mass difference, the reactor gets two chances to fission the nuclei as the mass increases: First as the effective fuel nuclei U233, and as it absorbs two more neutrons, again as the fuel nuclei U235.[38][39]

A reactor whose main purpose is to destroy actinides rather than increasing fissile fuel-stocks is sometimes known as a burner reactor. Both breeding and burning depend on good neutron economy, and many designs can do either. Breeding designs surround the core by a breeding blanket of fertile material. Waste burners surround the core with non-fertile wastes to be destroyed. Some designs add neutron reflectors or absorbers.[6]

Design

Conversion ratio

One measure of a reactor's performance is the "conversion ratio", defined as the ratio of new fissile atoms produced to fissile atoms consumed. All proposed nuclear reactors except specially designed and operated actinide burners[6] experience some degree of conversion. As long as there is any amount of a fertile material within the neutron flux of the reactor, some new fissile material is always created. When the conversion ratio is greater than 1, it is often called the "breeding ratio".

For example, commonly used light water reactors have a conversion ratio of approximately 0.6. Pressurized heavy-water reactors running on natural uranium have a conversion ratio of 0.8.[42] In a breeder reactor, the conversion ratio is higher than 1. "Break-even" is achieved when the conversion ratio reaches 1.0 and the reactor produces as much fissile material as it uses.

Doubling time

The doubling time is the amount of time it would take for a breeder reactor to produce enough new fissile material to replace the original fuel and additionally produce an equivalent amount of fuel for another nuclear reactor. This was considered an important measure of breeder performance in early years, when uranium was thought to be scarce. However, since uranium is more abundant than thought in the early days of nuclear reactor development, and given the amount of plutonium available in spent reactor fuel, doubling time has become a less important metric in modern breeder-reactor design.[43][44]

Burnup

"Burnup" is a measure of how much energy has been extracted from a given mass of heavy metal in fuel, often expressed (for power reactors) in terms of gigawatt-days per ton of heavy metal. Burnup is an important factor in determining the types and abundances of isotopes produced by a fission reactor. Breeder reactors by design have high burnup compared to a conventional reactor, as breeder reactors produce more of their waste in the form of fission products, while most or all of the actinides are meant to be fissioned and destroyed.[45]

In the past, breeder-reactor development focused on reactors with low breeding ratios, from 1.01 for the Shippingport Reactor[46][47] running on thorium fuel and cooled by conventional light water to over 1.2 for the Soviet BN-350 liquid-metal-cooled reactor.[48] Theoretical models of breeders with liquid sodium coolant flowing through tubes inside fuel elements ("tube-in-shell" construction) suggest breeding ratios of at least 1.8 are possible on an industrial scale.[49] The Soviet BR-1 test reactor achieved a breeding ratio of 2.5 under non-commercial conditions.[50]

Reprocessing

Fission of the nuclear fuel in any reactor unavoidably produces neutron-absorbing fission products. The fertile material from a breeder reactor then needs to be reprocessed to remove those neutron poisons. This step is required to fully utilize the ability to breed as much or more fuel than is consumed. All reprocessing can present a proliferation concern, since it can extract weapons-usable material from spent fuel.[51] The most common reprocessing technique, PUREX, presents a particular concern since it was expressly designed to separate plutonium. Early proposals for the breeder-reactor fuel cycle posed an even greater proliferation concern because they would use PUREX to separate plutonium in a highly attractive isotopic form for use in nuclear weapons.[52][53]

Several countries are developing reprocessing methods that do not separate the plutonium from the other actinides. For instance, the non-water-based pyrometallurgical electrowinning process, when used to reprocess fuel from an integral fast reactor, leaves large amounts of radioactive actinides in the reactor fuel.[13] More conventional water-based reprocessing systems include SANEX, UNEX, DIAMEX, COEX, and TRUEX, and proposals to combine PUREX with those and other co-processes. All these systems have moderately better proliferation resistance than PUREX, though their adoption rate is low.[54][55][56]

In the thorium cycle, thorium-232 breeds by converting first to protactinium-233, which then decays to uranium-233. If the protactinium remains in the reactor, small amounts of uranium-232 are also produced, which has the strong gamma emitter thallium-208 in its decay chain. Similar to uranium-fueled designs, the longer the fuel and fertile material remain in the reactor, the more of these undesirable elements build up. In the envisioned commercial thorium reactors, high levels of uranium-232 would be allowed to accumulate, leading to extremely high gamma-radiation doses from any uranium derived from thorium. These gamma rays complicate the safe handling of a weapon and the design of its electronics; this explains why uranium-233 has never been pursued for weapons beyond proof-of-concept demonstrations.[57]

While the thorium cycle may be proliferation-resistant with regard to uranium-233 extraction from fuel (because of the presence of uranium-232), it poses a proliferation risk from an alternate route of uranium-233 extraction, which involves chemically extracting protactinium-233 and allowing it to decay to pure uranium-233 outside of the reactor. This process is an obvious chemical operation which is not required for normal operation of these reactor designs, but it could feasibly happen beyond the oversight of organizations such as the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and thus must be safeguarded against.[58]

Production

Like many aspects of nuclear power, fast breeder reactors have been subject to much controversy over the years. In 2010 the International Panel on Fissile Materials said "After six decades and the expenditure of the equivalent of tens of billions of dollars, the promise of breeder reactors remains largely unfulfilled and efforts to commercialize them have been steadily cut back in most countries". In Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States, breeder reactor development programs have been abandoned.[59][60] The rationale for pursuing breeder reactors—sometimes explicit and sometimes implicit—was based on the following key assumptions:[60][61]

  • It was expected that uranium would be scarce and high-grade deposits would quickly become depleted if fission power were deployed on a large scale; the reality, however, is that since the end of the Cold War, uranium has been much cheaper and more abundant than early designers expected.[62]
  • It was expected that breeder reactors would quickly become economically competitive with the light-water reactors that dominate nuclear power today, but the reality is that capital costs are at least 25% more than water-cooled reactors.
  • It was thought that breeder reactors could be as safe and reliable as light-water reactors, but safety issues are cited as a concern with fast reactors that use a sodium coolant, where a leak could lead to a sodium fire.
  • It was expected that the proliferation risks posed by breeders and their "closed" fuel cycle, in which plutonium would be recycled, could be managed. But since plutonium-breeding reactors produce plutonium from U238, and thorium reactors produce fissile U233 from thorium, all breeding cycles could theoretically pose proliferation risks.[63] However U-232, which is always present in U-233 produced in breeder reactors, is a strong gamma-emitter via its daughter products, and would make weapon handling extremely hazardous and the weapon easy to detect.[64]

Some past anti-nuclear advocates have become pro-nuclear power as a clean source of electricity since breeder reactors effectively recycle most of their waste. This solves one of the most-important negative issues of nuclear power. In the documentary Pandora's Promise, a case is made for breeder reactors because they provide a real high-kW alternative to fossil fuel energy. According to the movie, one pound of uranium provides as much energy as 5,000 barrels of oil.[65]

Notable reactors

The Soviet Union constructed a series of fast reactors, the first being mercury-cooled and fueled with plutonium metal, and the later plants sodium-cooled and fueled with plutonium oxide. BR-1 (1955) was 100W (thermal) was followed by BR-2 at 100 kW and then the 5 MW BR-5.[50] BOR-60 (first criticality 1969) was 60 MW, with construction started in 1965.[72]

Future plants

India

India has been developing fast breeder reactors as part of its three-stage nuclear power programme. The 500 MWe Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR) at Kalpakkam achieved first criticality on 6 April 2026,[73][74][75] marking a major milestone in India’s fast breeder programme. The programme aims to use fertile thorium-232 to breed fissile uranium-233. India’s focus on thorium is due to its large domestic thorium reserves, although thorium resources are also widely available globally.

BHAVINI, an Indian nuclear power company, was established in 2003 to construct, commission, and operate all stage II fast breeder reactors outlined in India's three-stage nuclear power programme. To advance these plans, the FBR-600 is a pool-type sodium-cooled reactor with a rating of 600 MWe.

The Chinese Experimental Fast Reactor is a 65 MW (thermal), 20 MW (electric), sodium-cooled, pool-type reactor with a 30-year design lifetime and a target burnup of 100 MWd/kg.

China

The China Experimental Fast Reactor is a 25 MW(e) prototype for the planned China Prototype Fast Reactor.[76] It started generating power in 2011.[77] China initiated a research and development project in thorium molten-salt thermal breeder-reactor technology (liquid fluoride thorium reactor), formally announced at the Chinese Academy of Sciences annual conference in 2011. Its ultimate target was to investigate and develop a thorium-based molten salt nuclear system over about 20 years.[78][79]

South Korea

South Korea is developing a design for a standardized modular FBR for export, to complement the standardized pressurized water reactor and CANDU designs they have already developed and built, but has not yet committed to building a prototype.

A cutaway model of the BN-600 reactor, superseded by the BN-800 reactor family
Construction of the BN-800 reactor

Russia

Russia has a plan for increasing its fleet of fast breeder reactors significantly. A BN-800 reactor (800 MWe) at Beloyarsk was completed in 2012, succeeding a smaller BN-600.[80] It reached its full power production in 2016.[81] Plans for the construction of a larger BN-1200 reactor (1,200 MWe) was scheduled for completion in 2018, with two additional BN-1200 reactors built by the end of 2030.[82] However, in 2015 Rosenergoatom postponed construction indefinitely to allow fuel design to be improved after more experience of operating the BN-800 reactor, and among cost concerns.[83]

An experimental lead-cooled fast reactor, BREST-300 will be built at the Siberian Chemical Combine in Seversk. The BREST (Russian: bystry reaktor so svintsovym teplonositelem, English: fast reactor with lead coolant) design is seen as a successor to the BN series and the 300 MWe unit at the SCC could be the forerunner to a 1,200 MWe version for wide deployment as a commercial power generation unit. The development program is as part of an Advanced Nuclear Technologies Federal Program 2010–2020 that seeks to exploit fast reactors for uranium efficiency while 'burning' radioactive substances that would otherwise be disposed of as waste. Its core would measure about 2.3 metres in diameter by 1.1 metres in height and contain 16 tonnes of fuel. The unit would be refuelled every year, with each fuel element spending five years in total within the core. Lead coolant temperature would be around 540 °C, giving a high efficiency of 43%, primary heat production of 700 MWt yielding electrical power of 300 MWe. The operational lifespan of the unit could be 60 years. The design was expected to be completed by NIKIET in 2014 for construction between 2016 and 2020.[84] By the end of 2024 the cooling tower had been built, and the target for starting operation was 2026.

Japan

In 2006 the United States, France, and Japan signed an "arrangement" to research and develop sodium-cooled fast reactors in support of the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership.[85] In 2007 the Japanese government selected Mitsubishi Heavy Industries as the "core company in FBR development in Japan". Shortly thereafter, Mitsubishi FBR Systems was launched to develop and eventually sell FBR technology.[86]

The Marcoule Nuclear Site in France, location of the Phénix (on the left)

France

In 2010 the French government allocated €651.6 million to the Commissariat à l'énergie atomique to finalize the design of ASTRID (Advanced Sodium Technological Reactor for Industrial Demonstration), a 600 MW fourth-generation reactor design to be finalized in 2020.[87][88]As of 2013 the UK had shown interest in the PRISM reactor and was working in concert with France to develop ASTRID. In 2019, CEA announced this design would not be built before mid-century.[89]

United States

Assembly of the core of Experimental Breeder Reactor I in Idaho, United States, 1951

Kirk Sorensen, former NASA scientist and chief nuclear technologist at Teledyne Brown Engineering, has long been a promoter of thorium fuel cycle and particularly liquid fluoride thorium reactors. In 2011, Sorensen founded Flibe Energy, a company aimed to develop 20–50 MW LFTR reactor designs to power military bases.[90][91][92]

In October 2010 GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy signed a memorandum of understanding with the operators of the US Department of Energy'sSavannah River Site, which should allow the construction of a demonstration plant based on the company's S-PRISM fast breeder reactor prior to the design receiving full Nuclear Regulatory Commission licensing approval.[93] In October 2011 The Independent reported that the UK Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) and senior advisers within the Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC) had asked for technical and financial details of PRISM, partly as a means of reducing the country's plutonium stockpile.[94]

The traveling wave reactor proposed in a patent by Intellectual Ventures is a fast breeder reactor designed to not need fuel reprocessing during the decades-long lifetime of the reactor. The breed-burn wave in the TWR design does not move from one end of the reactor to the other but gradually from the inside out. Moreover, as the fuel's composition changes through nuclear transmutation, fuel rods are continually reshuffled within the core to optimize the neutron flux and fuel usage at any given point in time. Thus, instead of letting the wave propagate through the fuel, the fuel itself is moved through a largely stationary burn wave. This is contrary to many media reports, which have popularized the concept as a candle-like reactor with a burn region that moves down a stick of fuel. By replacing a static core configuration with an actively managed "standing wave" or "soliton" core, TerraPower's design avoids the problem of cooling a highly variable burn region. Under this scenario, the reconfiguration of fuel rods is accomplished remotely by robotic devices; the containment vessel remains closed during the procedure, and there is no associated downtime.[95]

See also

References

  1. 12Waltar AE, Reynolds AB (1981). Fast breeder reactors. New York: Pergamon Press. ISBN 978-0-08-025983-3. Archived from the original on 5 January 2014. Retrieved 4 June 2016.
  2. ↑Helmreich, J. E. Gathering Rare Ores: The Diplomacy of Uranium Acquisition, 1943–1954, Princeton UP, 1986: ch. 10 ISBN 0-7837-9349-9.
  3. ↑"VT-1 Atomic Reactor, Submarine". www.globalsecurity.org. Retrieved 12 March 2026.
  4. ↑"Liquid Metal Cooled Reactor - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics". www.sciencedirect.com. Retrieved 12 March 2026.
  5. ↑"A Technology Roadmap for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems"(PDF). Generation IV International Forum. December 2002. GIF-002-00. Archived(PDF) from the original on 1 July 2015. Retrieved 1 July 2015.
  6. 1234E. A. Hoffman; W. S. Yang; R. N. Hill. "Preliminary Core Design Studies for the Advanced Burner Reactor over a Wide Range of Conversion Ratios"(PDF). Argonne National Laboratory. ANL-AFCI-177.
  7. ↑ T. Nakatsuka; et al. Estado actual de la investigación y el desarrollo del reactor rápido refrigerado por agua supercrítica (reactor superrápido) en Japón . Presentado en la reunión del Comité Técnico del OIEA sobre SCWR en Pisa, del 5 al 8 de julio de 2010 . 
  8. ↑ Davis, Thomas P. (2018). "Revisión de los materiales a base de hierro aplicables al combustible y al núcleo de los futuros reactores rápidos de sodio (SFR)" (PDF) . Oficina de Regulación Nuclear . Archivado (PDF) del original el 3 de enero de 2019. Recuperado el 2 de enero de 2019 .
  9. ↑ "El reactor rápido integral" . Reactores diseñados por el Laboratorio Nacional Argonne . Laboratorio Nacional Argonne. Archivado del original el 17 de septiembre de 2013. Consultado el 20 de mayo de 2013 .
  10. ↑ "Análisis de Política Nacional n.º 378: Reactores rápidos integrales: fuente de energía segura, abundante y no contaminante – diciembre de 2001" . Archivado del original el 25 de enero de 2016. Consultado el 13 de octubre de 2007 .
  11. ↑ Hannum, WH, Marsh, GE y Stanford, GS (2004). PUREX y PYRO no son lo mismo. Archivado el 23 de enero de 2022 en Wayback Machine . Física y Sociedad, julio de 2004.
  12. ↑ Universidad de Washington (2004). Datos sobre energía: Energía en procesos naturales y consumo humano, algunos datos. Archivado el 15 de septiembre de 2012 en Wayback Machine . Consultado el 16 de octubre de 2007.
  13. 1 2 3 4 "Tecnologías de piroprocesamiento: Reciclaje de combustible nuclear usado para un futuro energético sostenible" (PDF) . Laboratorio Nacional Argonne. Archivado (PDF) del original el 19 de febrero de 2013.
  14. ↑ Kirsch, Steve. "El proyecto del reactor rápido integral (IFR): Preguntas y respuestas del Congreso" . Archivado del original el 16 de diciembre de 2012. Recuperado el 25 de diciembre de 2012 .
  15. ↑ Stanford, George S. "Comentarios sobre la desacertada terminación del proyecto IFR" (PDF) . Archivado (PDF) del original el 15 de diciembre de 2012. Recuperado el 25 de diciembre de 2012 .
  16. 123Patenaude, Hannah K.; Freibert, Franz J. (3 July 2023). "Oh, My Darling Clementine: A Detailed History and Data Repository of the Los Alamos Plutonium Fast Reactor". Nuclear Technology. 209 (7): 963–1007. Bibcode:2023NucTe.209..963P. doi:10.1080/00295450.2023.2176686. ISSN 0029-5450.
  17. ↑Werner Meyer-Larsen: Der Koloß von Kalkar. Der Spiegel 43/1981 vom 19 October 1981, S. 42–55. [["Der Koloß von Kalkar", Der Spiegel, 13 September]] (German)
  18. ↑"Thorium". Archived from the original on 19 April 2012. Retrieved 14 June 2012.
  19. ↑"Shippingport Atomic Power Station: A National Historic Mechanical Engineering Landmark"(PDF). Archived(PDF) from the original on 29 November 2007.
  20. ↑Adams, Rod (1 October 1995). "Light Water Breeder Reactor: Adapting A Proven System". Archived from the original on 28 October 2012. Retrieved 2 October 2012.
  21. ↑ThoriumArchived 19 April 2012 at the Wayback Machine information from the World Nuclear Association
  22. ↑Stenger, Victor (12 January 2012). "LFTR: A Long-Term Energy Solution?". Huffington Post. Archived from the original on 22 December 2016. Retrieved 30 September 2012.
  23. 12Cohen, Bernard L. "Breeder reactors: A renewable energy source"(PDF). Argonne National Laboratory. Archived from the original(PDF) on 14 January 2013. Retrieved 25 December 2012.
  24. ↑Weinberg, A. M., and R. P. Hammond (1970). "Limits to the use of energy," Am. Sci. 58, 412.
  25. ↑"There's Atomic Energy in Granite". 8 February 2013.
  26. ↑ Además del radio (elemento 88). Si bien es un subactínido, precede inmediatamente al actinio (89) y sigue a un intervalo de inestabilidad de tres elementos después del polonio (84), donde ningún nucleido tiene una vida media de al menos cuatro años (el nucleido de mayor vida en este intervalo es el radón-222, con una vida media inferior a cuatro días ). Por lo tanto, el isótopo de mayor vida del radio, con 1600 años, justifica la inclusión de este elemento en esta lista.
  27. ↑ Específicamente a partir de la fisión de neutrones térmicos del uranio-235, por ejemplo, en un reactor nuclear típico .
  28. ↑ Milsted, J.; Friedman, AM; Stevens, CM (1965). "La vida media alfa del berkelio-247; un nuevo isómero de larga duración del berkelio-248". Física Nuclear . 71 (2): 299. Bibcode : 1965NucPh..71..299M . doi : 10.1016/0029-5582(65)90719-4 .Los análisis isotópicos revelaron una especie de masa 248 en abundancia constante en tres muestras analizadas durante un período de aproximadamente 10 meses. Esto se atribuyó a un isómero de Bk 248 con una vida media superior a 9 años. No se detectó crecimiento de Cf 248 , y se puede establecer un límite inferior para la vida media β− de aproximadamente 10⁴ años . No se ha detectado actividad alfa atribuible al nuevo isómero; la vida media alfa es probablemente superior a 300 años.
  29. ↑ Este es el nucleido más pesado con una vida media de al menos cuatro años antes del " mar de inestabilidad ".
  30. ↑ Excluyendo aquellos nucleidos " clásicamente estables " con vidas medias significativamente superiores a la del 232 Th; por ejemplo, mientras que el 113m Cd tiene una vida media de solo catorce años, la del 113 Cd es de ocho cuatrillones de años.
  31. ↑ "Gestión de residuos radiactivos" . Asociación Nuclear Mundial. Archivado del original el 21 de septiembre de 2013. Consultado el 19 de septiembre de 2013 .
  32. 1 2 "Suministro de uranio" . Asociación Nuclear Mundial. Archivado del original el 12 de febrero de 2013. Recuperado el 11 de marzo de 2012 .
  33. 1 2 Bodansky, David (enero de 2006). "El estado de la eliminación de residuos nucleares" . Física y sociedad . 35 (1). Sociedad Estadounidense de Física. Archivado del original el 16 de mayo de 2008. Recuperado el 30 de julio de 2012 .
  34. ↑ "Documento informativo 15" . Asociación Nuclear Mundial. Archivado del original el 30 de marzo de 2010. Consultado el 15 de diciembre de 2012 .
  35. ↑ U. Mertyurek; MW Francis; IC Gauld. "Análisis de la escala 5 de las composiciones isotópicas del combustible nuclear gastado de BWR para estudios de seguridad" (PDF) . ORNL/TM-2010/286 . Laboratorio Nacional Oak Ridge. Archivado (PDF) del original el 17 de febrero de 2013. Recuperado el 25 de diciembre de 2012 .
  36. ↑ "Reactores reproductores rápidos" (PDF) . Archivado (PDF) del original el 29 de marzo de 2016. Consultado el 4 de junio de 2016 .
  37. ↑ "Secciones transversales de neutrones4.7.2" . Laboratorio Nacional de Física. Archivado del original el 1 de enero de 2013. Recuperado el 17 de diciembre de 2012 .
  38. ↑ David, Sylvain; Elisabeth Huffer; Hervé Nifenecker. "Revisando el ciclo del combustible nuclear de torio-uranio" (PDF) . europhysicsnews. Archivado del original (PDF) el 12 de julio de 2007. Consultado el 11 de noviembre de 2018 .
  39. ↑ "Isótopos fisionables" . Archivado del original el 8 de noviembre de 2012. Consultado el 25 de diciembre de 2012 .
  40. ↑ "Energía abundante: La historia del reactor rápido integral" (PDF) . pág. 21. Archivado (PDF) del original el 27 de octubre de 2014. Recuperado el 2 de marzo de 2015 . 
  41. ↑ "Tabla de sección transversal" .
  42. ↑ Kadak, Prof. Andrew C. "Conferencia 4, Agotamiento del combustible y efectos relacionados" . Seguridad operativa de reactores 22.091/22.903 . Hemisphere, según la referencia del MIT. pág. Tabla 6-1, "Relaciones promedio de conversión o reproducción para sistemas de reactores de referencia". Archivado del original el 17 de octubre de 2015. Recuperado el 24 de diciembre de 2012 . 
  43. ↑ Rodríguez, Placid; Lee, SM "¿Quién teme a los criadores?" . Centro Indira Gandhi para la Investigación Atómica, Kalpakkam 603 102, India. Archivado del original el 26 de marzo de 2013. Recuperado el 24 de diciembre de 2012 .
  44. ↑ R. Prasad (10 de octubre de 2002). «Reactor reproductor rápido: ¿Es necesario el combustible avanzado?» . The Hindu . Chennai, India. Archivado del original el 5 de diciembre de 2003.
  45. ↑ "Sistemas de reactores rápidos y combustibles innovadores para el reciclaje homogéneo de actínidos menores" (PDF) . Archivado (PDF) del original el 13 de octubre de 2016.
  46. ↑ Adams, R. (1995). Reactor reproductor de agua ligera ( Archivado el 15 de septiembre de 2007 en Wayback Machine ), Atomic Energy Insights 1 .
  47. ↑ Kasten, PR (1998) Revisión del concepto del reactor de torio de Radkowsky ( Archivado el 25 de febrero de 2009 en Wayback Machine ). Science & Global Security 7 , 237–269.
  48. ↑ Reactores reproductores rápidos ( Archivado el 11 de septiembre de 2006 en Wayback Machine ), Departamento de Física y Astronomía, Universidad Estatal de Georgia . Consultado el 16 de octubre de 2007.
  49. ↑ Hiraoka, T., Sako, K., Takano, H., Ishii, T., y Sato, M. (1991). Un reactor rápido de alta reproducción con purga de gas de productos de fisión/conjuntos de combustible metálico de tubo en carcasa ( Archivado el 29 de septiembre de 2007 en Wayback Machine ). Nuclear Technology 93 , 305–329.
  50. 1 2 Valerii Korobeinikov (31 de marzo - 2 de abril de 2014). Conceptos innovadores basados ​​en la tecnología de reactores rápidos (PDF) . Primera reunión de consulta para la revisión de conceptos innovadores de reactores para la prevención de accidentes graves y la mitigación de sus consecuencias. Organismo Internacional de Energía Atómica . Archivado del original (PDF) el 4 de marzo de 2016.
  51. ↑ R. Bari; et al. (2009). "Estudio de reducción del riesgo de proliferación del procesamiento alternativo de combustible gastado" (PDF) . BNL-90264-2009-CP . Laboratorio Nacional de Brookhaven. Archivado (PDF) del original el 21 de septiembre de 2013. Recuperado el 16 de diciembre de 2012 . 
  52. ↑ CG Bathke; et al. (2008). "Una evaluación de la resistencia a la proliferación de materiales en ciclos de combustible avanzados" (PDF) . Departamento de Energía. Archivado del original (PDF) el 4 de junio de 2009. Recuperado el 16 de diciembre de 2012 . 
  53. ↑ "Una evaluación de la resistencia a la proliferación de materiales en ciclos avanzados de combustible nuclear" (PDF) . 2008. Archivado del original (PDF) el 21 de septiembre de 2013. Recuperado el 16 de diciembre de 2012 .
  54. ↑ Ozawa, M.; Sano, Y.; Nomura, K.; Koma, Y.; Takanashi, M. "Un nuevo sistema de reprocesamiento compuesto por procesos PUREX y TRUEX para la separación total de radionúclidos de larga vida" (PDF) . Archivado (PDF) del original el 21 de septiembre de 2013. Recuperado el 20 de septiembre de 2013 .
  55. ↑ Simpson, Michael F.; Law, Jack D. (febrero de 2010). "Reprocesamiento de combustible nuclear" (PDF) . Laboratorio Nacional de Idaho. Archivado (PDF) del original el 21 de septiembre de 2013. Recuperado el 20 de septiembre de 2013 .
  56. ↑ "Estudio de reducción del riesgo de proliferación del procesamiento alternativo de combustible gastado" (PDF) . Archivado (PDF) del original el 1 de enero de 2017. Recuperado el 1 de enero de 2017 .
  57. ↑ Kang y Von Hippel (2001). "U-232 y la resistencia a la proliferación del U-233 en el combustible gastado" (PDF) . 0892-9882/01 . Science & Global Security, Volumen 9, págs. 1-32. Archivado del original (PDF) el 30 de marzo de 2015. Recuperado el 18 de diciembre de 2012 .
  58. ↑ "Torio: Advertencias sobre la proliferación del 'combustible milagroso' nuclear"" . 2012. Archivado del original el 23 de septiembre de 2017 . Consultado el 22 de septiembre de 2017 .
  59. ↑ MV Ramana ; Mycle Schneider (mayo-junio de 2010). "Es hora de abandonar los reactores reproductores" (PDF) . Boletín de los científicos atómicos . Archivado (PDF) del original el 6 de diciembre de 2013. Recuperado el 3 de diciembre de 2013 .
  60. 1 2 Frank von Hippel; et al. (febrero de 2010). Programas de reactores reproductores rápidos: historia y estado (PDF) . Panel Internacional sobre Materiales Fisionables. ISBN  978-0-9819275-6-5. Archivado (PDF) del original el 7 de abril de 2020. Recuperado el 28 de abril de 2014 .
  61. ↑ MV Ramana ; Mycle Schneider (mayo-junio de 2010). "Es hora de abandonar los reactores reproductores" (PDF) . Boletín de los científicos atómicos . Archivado (PDF) del original el 6 de diciembre de 2013. Recuperado el 3 de diciembre de 2013 .
  62. ↑ "Oferta y demanda mundial de uranio – Consejo de Relaciones Exteriores" . Archivado del original el 10 de abril de 2012. Consultado el 10 de febrero de 2012 .
  63. ↑ "Oferta y demanda mundial de uranio – Consejo de Relaciones Exteriores" . Archivado del original el 5 de mayo de 2012. Consultado el 25 de julio de 2012 .
  64. ↑ Introducción a las armas de destrucción masiva , Langford, R. Everett (2004). Hoboken, Nueva Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. pág. 85. ISBN 0-471-46560-7Estados Unidos probó algunas bombas de uranio-233, pero la presencia de uranio-232 en el uranio-233 resultó problemática; el uranio-232 es un emisor alfa abundante y tendía a "envenenar" la bomba de uranio-233 al desprender neutrones errantes de las impurezas del material, lo que podía provocar una detonación prematura. La separación del uranio-232 del uranio-233 resultó ser muy difícil e impracticable. La bomba de uranio-233 nunca se utilizó, ya que el plutonio-239 se estaba volviendo abundante.
  65. ↑ Len Koch, ingeniero nuclear pionero (2013). La promesa de Pandora (Película). Impact Partners y CNN Films. Minuto 11. Archivado del original (DVD, streaming) el 18 de abril de 2014. Recuperado el 24 de abril de 2014. Una libra de uranio, que es del tamaño de la punta de mi dedo, si se pudiera liberar toda la energía, tiene el equivalente a unos 5000 barriles de petróleo.
  66. ↑ "Fusión nuclear: WNA - Asociación Nuclear Mundial" . Archivado del original el 16 de marzo de 2015. Consultado el 2 de marzo de 2015 .
  67. ↑ SR Pillai, MV Ramana (2014). "Reactores reproductores: una posible conexión entre la corrosión de metales y las fugas de sodio" . Boletín de los científicos atómicos . 70 (3): 49– 55. Bibcode : 2014BuAtS..70c..49P . doi : 10.1177/0096340214531178 . S2CID 144406710. Archivado del original el 17 de octubre de 2015. Recuperado el 15 de febrero de 2015 . 
  68. ↑ "Base de datos sobre reactores nucleares" . PRIS . OIEA. Archivado del original el 2 de junio de 2013. Consultado el 15 de febrero de 2015 .
  69. ↑ "Reactor reproductor experimental 1 (EBR-1) - Cheeka Tales" . Archivado del original el 2 de abril de 2015. Consultado el 2 de marzo de 2015 .
  70. ↑ "Los nuevos reactores reproductores de China podrían producir más que solo vatios - IEEE Spectrum" .
  71. ↑ "Reactor rápido chino comienza operación a alta potencia: New Nuclear - World Nuclear News" . 19 de febrero de 2021.
  72. ↑ FSUE "Centro Científico Estatal de la Federación Rusa, Instituto de Investigación de Reactores Atómicos". "Reactor rápido experimental BOR-60" . Archivado del original el 31 de diciembre de 2012. Recuperado el 15 de junio de 2012 .
  73. ↑ Diseño conceptual del núcleo del PFBR , SM Lee, S Govindarajan, R. Indira, TM John, P. Mohanakrishnan, R. Shankar Singh, S B. Bhoje, Centro Indira Gandhi para la Investigación Atómica (IGCAR), Kalpakkam, India. Archivado el 20 de septiembre de 2021 en Wayback Machine .
  74. ↑ "FBR-600 - Reactor reproductor rápido comercial de próxima generación de la India [ CFBR ] " . Archivado del original el 20 de septiembre de 2021. Consultado el 20 de septiembre de 2021 .
  75. ↑ «El primer reactor reproductor rápido prototipo de la India se encuentra en las etapas finales de puesta en marcha» . The New Indian Express . 30 de octubre de 2020. Archivado del original el 20 de septiembre de 2021. Consultado el 20 de septiembre de 2021 .
  76. ↑ "Base de datos de reactores rápidos del OIEA" (PDF) . Archivado (PDF) del original el 28 de junio de 2011. Consultado el 13 de marzo de 2011 .
  77. ↑ "El reactor experimental de neutrones rápidos de China comienza a generar energía" . xinhuanet. Julio de 2011. Archivado del original el 7 de abril de 2016. Consultado el 21 de julio de 2011 .
  78. ↑ Qimin, Xu (26 de enero de 2011). "El futuro de la seguridad de las centrales nucleares no depende de ser exigente con la comida".( en chino) . Consultado el 30 de octubre de 2011. Ayer, como la primera Academia China de Ciencias en iniciar uno de los proyectos estratégicos líderes en ciencia y tecnología, se lanzó oficialmente el proyecto "El futuro de la energía de fisión nuclear avanzada: energía nuclear, sistema de reactor de sales fundidas a base de torio". El objetivo científico es desarrollar en unos 20 años una nueva generación de sistemas de energía nuclear, todo el nivel técnico alcanzado en las pruebas y poseer todos los derechos de propiedad intelectual.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: servicio de archivado obsoleto ( enlace )
  79. ↑ Clark, Duncan (16 de febrero de 2011). "China entra en la carrera por desarrollar energía nuclear a partir de torio" . Blog de Medio Ambiente . Londres: The Guardian (Reino Unido). Archivado del original el 19 de mayo de 2017. Recuperado el 30 de octubre de 2011 .
  80. ↑ "Белоярская АЭС: начался выход БН-800 на minимальный уровень мощности" . AtomInfo.ru. Archivado desde el original el 30 de junio de 2014 . Consultado el 27 de julio de 2014 .
  81. ↑ "El reactor rápido ruso alcanza su máxima potencia" . Archivado del original el 27 de octubre de 2017. Consultado el 27 de octubre de 2017 .
  82. ↑ "До 2030 в России намечено строительство трёх энергоблоков с реакторами БН-1200" . AtomInfo.ru. Archivado desde el original el 5 de agosto de 2014 . Consultado el 27 de julio de 2014 .
  83. ↑ "Rusia pospone el BN-1200 para mejorar el diseño del combustible" . Noticias Nucleares Mundiales. 16 de abril de 2015. Archivado del original el 21 de junio de 2015. Consultado el 19 de abril de 2015 .
  84. ↑ "Acelerados avances en el desarrollo nuclear en Siberia" . Asociación Nuclear Mundial. Archivado del original el 12 de octubre de 2012. Consultado el 8 de octubre de 2012 .
  85. ↑ "Departamento de Energía – El Foro Internacional de Generación IV firma un acuerdo para colaborar en reactores rápidos refrigerados por sodio" . Archivado del original el 20 de abril de 2008.
  86. ↑ "MHI lanza un grupo de reactores reproductores rápidos" . Nuclear Engineering International . 2 de julio de 2007. Archivado del original el 28 de julio de 2007. Consultado el 13 de marzo de 2011 .
  87. ↑ Noticias nucleares mundiales (16 de septiembre de 2010). "El gobierno francés aporta fondos para Astrid" . Archivado del original el 14 de julio de 2014. Consultado el 15 de junio de 2012 .
  88. ^ "Quatrième génération: vers un nucléaire durable" (PDF) (en francés). CEA. Archivado (PDF) desde el original el 3 de junio de 2012 . Consultado el 15 de junio de 2012 .
  89. ↑ "Francia abandona sus planes de construir un reactor nuclear refrigerado por sodio" . Reuters . 30 de agosto de 2019. Archivado del original el 24 de septiembre de 2019. Consultado el 20 de noviembre de 2019 .
  90. ↑ "Flibe Energy" . Archivado del original el 7 de febrero de 2013. Consultado el 29 de octubre de 2011 .
  91. ↑ "Chat en vivo: el tecnólogo nuclear del torio Kirk Sorensen" . Blog de Medio Ambiente . Londres: The Guardian (Reino Unido). 7 de septiembre de 2001. Archivado del original el 15 de julio de 2014. Consultado el 30 de octubre de 2011 .
  92. ↑ Martin, William T. (27 de septiembre de 2011). "Nueva empresa de Huntsville construirá reactores nucleares basados ​​en torio" . Huntsville Newswire. Archivado del original el 6 de abril de 2012. Recuperado el 30 de octubre de 2011 .
  93. ↑ "Propuesta de prototipo de prisma para Savannah River" . Noticias nucleares mundiales . 28 de octubre de 2010. Archivado del original el 28 de enero de 2019. Consultado el 4 de noviembre de 2010 .
  94. ↑ Connor, Steve (28 de octubre de 2011). "Nueva vida para una vieja idea que podría disolver nuestros residuos nucleares" . The Independent . Londres. Archivado del original el 29 de octubre de 2011. Recuperado el 30 de octubre de 2011 .
  95. ↑ "TR10: Reactor de onda viajera" . Technology Review . Marzo de 2009. Archivado del original el 4 de mayo de 2012. Consultado el 6 de marzo de 2009 .
  • Compendio informativo, 2022–2023 (NUREG-1350, Volumen 34) , NRC
  • Reactores diseñados por el Laboratorio Nacional Argonne: Tecnología de reactores rápidos. Argonne fue pionero en el desarrollo de reactores rápidos y es líder mundial en este campo. Véase también el legado de Argonne en ciencia y tecnología nuclear .
  • La necesidad cambiante de un reactor reproductor, por Richard Wilson, en el 24º Simposio Anual del Instituto del Uranio, septiembre de 1999.
  • Reactor Reproductor Experimental-II (EBR-II): Una Central Nuclear Experimental Integrada de Reactor Rápido
  • Organización Internacional de Energía del Torio – www.IThEO.org
  • Un camino a seguir para el LMFBR
  • Fabricación de combustible de plutonio por el Laboratorio Nacional Argonne enYouTube